IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v50y2026i2p231-255.html

Increasing Internal and External Validity Through a Multimethod Evaluation With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Process Tracing: The Case of Training Transfer Effectiveness in Flemish SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Priscilla Alamos-Concha
  • Valèrie Pattyn
  • Bart Cambré
  • Benoît Rihoux

Abstract

This paper presents a methodological advancement by integrating Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Process Tracing (PT) in the evaluation of training transfer effectiveness in Flemish SMEs. This multimethod approach leverages the strengths of both QCA and PT to enhance internal and external validity, offering a robust framework for capturing the conditions and causal mechanisms underlying policy interventions. By sequentially applying QCA to identify necessary and sufficient conditions and PT to unpack the causal processes, the study provides a comprehensive analysis that addresses both “what works†and “how it works.†Our findings demonstrate that combining these methods allows for more nuanced insights into the effectiveness of training programs, ultimately contributing to the empirical validation of policy theories and the development of evidence-based interventions. This research underscores the potential of multimethod evaluations to produce more reliable and generalizable results, thereby offering valuable guidance for evaluators and policymakers seeking to enhance the impact of their programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Priscilla Alamos-Concha & Valèrie Pattyn & Bart Cambré & Benoît Rihoux, 2026. "Increasing Internal and External Validity Through a Multimethod Evaluation With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Process Tracing: The Case of Training Transfer Effectiveness in Flemish SMEs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 50(2), pages 231-255, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:231-255
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X251352020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X251352020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X251352020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara Befani & Fritz Sager, 2006. "QCA as a Tool for Realistic Evaluations," Springer Books, in: Benoît Rihoux & Heike Grimm (ed.), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis, chapter 0, pages 263-284, Springer.
    2. Priscilla Álamos-Concha & Valérie Pattyn & Benoît Rihoux & Benjamin Schalembier & Derek Beach & Bart Cambré, 2022. "Conservative solutions for progress: on solution types when combining QCA with in-depth Process-Tracing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1965-1997, August.
    3. Priscilla Álamos-Concha & Valérie Pattyn & Benoît Rihoux & Benjamin Schalembier & Derek Beach & Bart Cambré, 2022. "Correction to: Conservative solutions for progress: on solution types when combining QCA with in‑depth Process‑Tracing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1999-2000, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saka-Helmhout, Ayse & Álamos-Concha, Priscilla & López, Mabel Machado & Hagan, Julie & Murray, Gregor & Edwards, Tony & Kern, Philipp & Martin, Isabelle & Zhang, Ling Eleanor, 2024. "Stakeholder engagement strategies for impactful corporate social innovation initiatives by multinational enterprises," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    2. Borgna, Camilla & Struffolino, Emanuela, 2018. "Unpacking Configurational Dynamics: Sequence Analysis and Qualitative Comparative Analysis as a Mixed-Method Design," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 167-184.
    3. Homa Bahmani & Wei Zhang, 2022. "Why Do Communities Recover Differently after Socio-Natural Disasters? Pathways to Comprehensive Success of Recovery Projects Based on Bam’s (Iran) Neighborhoods’ Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-29, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:231-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.