IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v49y2025i4p708-738.html

Evaluating the Effect on Infants and Parents Attending the Parent–Child Psychological Support Programme®, a Community-Based Program to Promote Attachment Security

Author

Listed:
  • Jesús M. Jornet-Meliá
  • Carlos Sancho-Ã lvarez
  • Purificación Sánchez-Delgado
  • M. Ã ngeles Cerezo

Abstract

The foremost index of caregiving quality is child attachment, as supported by attachment theory. Research supports the relevance of early parenting interventions in improving child outcomes in attachment quality to promote public health because of their long-term effects on mental health and functioning. This study aimed at evaluating the impact on both parenting and child outcomes of the Parent–Child Psychological Support Programme® (PCPS), a community-based program individually tailored to parents and their infants during periodic center-based visits to promote attachment security. The evaluation involved two cohorts from “vulnerable populations†and used the resources embedded in the program design without interfering with the normal functioning of the service. From an evaluative research approach, the effects on mothers and children were assessed using a quantitative approach. Pre- and post-test measures (parenting questionnaires) and child attachment quality assessments through the Strange Situation Procedure were examined. The equivalence of the cohorts was verified and used as a baseline for parenting outcomes. PCPS participants demonstrated increased parental competence and self-efficacy, as well as reduced levels of parenting stress. Analysis of the two cohorts showed a significant difference in the number of visits and proxies for intervention, which were associated with the expected pre–post changes in parenting dimensions. The proportion of securely attached children was significantly higher in the “medium-high intervention†group than in the “no/low intervention†group (72.7% vs 54.5%). Furthermore, compared with international baselines, this proportion showed no differences in the “no-/low-intervention†group but demonstrated expected significant differences in the “medium-high intervention†group.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesús M. Jornet-Meliá & Carlos Sancho-à lvarez & Purificación Sánchez-Delgado & M. à ngeles Cerezo, 2025. "Evaluating the Effect on Infants and Parents Attending the Parent–Child Psychological Support Programme®, a Community-Based Program to Promote Attachment Security," Evaluation Review, , vol. 49(4), pages 708-738, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:49:y:2025:i:4:p:708-738
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X251315508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X251315508
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X251315508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cerezo, M. Angeles & Dasi, Carmen & Ruiz, Juan Carlos, 2013. "Supporting parenting of infants: Evaluating outcomes for parents and children in a community-based program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 12-20.
    2. M. Teresa Anguera & Angel Blanco-Villaseñor & José Luis Losada & Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, 2018. "Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2757-2770, November.
    3. Rosa M. Trenado & M. Angeles Cerezo & Purificación Sierra-García & Gemma Pons-Salvador, 2021. "Sequential coding of maternal sensitivity: application of nonlinear dynamic analyses and reliability," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 827-844, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosa M. Trenado & M. Angeles Cerezo & Purificación Sierra-García & Gemma Pons-Salvador, 2021. "Sequential coding of maternal sensitivity: application of nonlinear dynamic analyses and reliability," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 827-844, June.
    2. Lane, Julie & Manceau, Luiza Maria & de Chantal, Pier-Luc & Chagnon, Alexandre & Cardinal, Michael & Lauzier-Jobin, François & Lanoue, Sèverine, 2024. "Implementing a mental health app library in primary care: A feasibility study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Chiva-Bartoll, Oscar & Maravé-Vivas, María & Salvador-García, Celina & Valverde-Esteve, Teresa, 2021. "Impact of a physical education service-learning programme on ASD children: A mixed-methods approach," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Caitlyn S. White & Erica Spry & Emma Griffiths & Emma Carlin, 2021. "Equity in Access: A Mixed Methods Exploration of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Access Program for the Kimberley Region, Western Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Celia Camilli Trujillo & Laura Cuervo Calvo & Desirée García Gil & Carolina Bonastre Valles, 2022. "Mixed methods research in service-learning: an integrative systematic review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2361-2386, August.
    6. Christa E. Winkler & Annie M. Wofford, 2024. "Trends and Motivations in Critical Quantitative Educational Research: A Multimethod Examination Across Higher Education Scholarship and Author Perspectives," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(7), pages 1368-1394, November.
    7. Zhang, Tingting & Yan, Xiangbin & Wang, William Yu Chung & Chen, Qin, 2021. "Unveiling physicians’ personal branding strategies in online healthcare service platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. David Martín-Martínez & Pere Lavega-Burgués & Cristòfol Salas-Santandreu & Conxita Duran-Delgado & Queralt Prat & Sabrine Damian-Silva & Leonardo Machado & Pablo Aires-Araujo & Verónica Muñoz-Arroyave, 2021. "Relationships, Decisions, and Physical Effort in the Marro Traditional Sporting Game: A Multimodal Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-27, October.
    9. McGuinness, Seamus & Bergin, Adele & Whelan, Adele, 2016. "An Exploration of (Area-based) Social Inclusion and Community Development Training Programmes in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS54.
    10. Riccardo Bonazzi & Heidi Gautschi & Gianluigi Viscusi, 2023. "Discussing blockchain applications in TED Talks: A fashion wave approach to understanding the blockchain phenomenon," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Rubén Maneiro & José Luís Losada & Mariona Portell & Antonio Ardá, 2021. "Observational Analysis of Corner Kicks in High-Level Football: A Mixed Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Bujold, M. & El Sherif, R. & Bush, P.L. & Johnson-Lafleur, J. & Doray, G. & Pluye, P., 2018. "Ecological content validation of the Information Assessment Method for parents (IAM-parent): A mixed methods study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 79-88.
    13. Anna M. Sene-Mir & Mariona Portell & M. Teresa Anguera & Salvador Chacón-Moscoso, 2020. "Manual Material Handling Training: The Effect of Self-Observation, Hetero-Observational and Intrinsic Feedback on Workers’ Knowledge and Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, November.
    14. McGuinness, Seamus & Bergin, Adele & Whelan, Adele, 2017. "Making centralised data work for community development: an exploration of area-based training programmes in a unified framework," Papers WP555, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    15. Macarena Valenzuela-Zubiaur & Héctor Torres-Bustos & Mónica Arroyo-Vázquez & Pablo Ferrer-Gisbert, 2021. "Promotion of Social Innovation through Fab Labs. The Case of ProteinLab UTEM in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Messerle, Robert & Hoogestraat, Fenja & Wild, Eva-Maria, 2024. "Which factors influence the decision of hospitals to provide procedures on an outpatient basis? –Mixed-methods evidence from Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    17. Bigne, Enrique & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Ruiz, Carla, 2020. "Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 403-416.
    18. Hickey, Grainne & McGilloway, Sinead & O'Brien, Morgan & Leckey, Yvonne & Devlin, Maurice & Donnelly, Michael, 2018. "Strengthening stakeholder buy-in and engagement for successful exploration and installation: A case study of the development of an area-wide, evidence-based prevention and early intervention strategy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 185-195.
    19. Joseph Friedman & George Karandinos & Laurie Kain Hart & Fernando Montero Castrillo & Nicholas Graetz & Philippe Bourgois, 2019. "Structural vulnerability to narcotics-driven firearm violence: An ethnographic and epidemiological study of Philadelphia’s Puerto Rican inner-city," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, November.
    20. Seamus McGuinness & Adele Bergin & Adele Whelan, 2017. "Using monitoring data to assess community development: Evidence from Ireland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(6), pages 539-564, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:49:y:2025:i:4:p:708-738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.