IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v48y2024i2p346-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Stroke Risk of Patients using Machine Learning: A New Perspective from Sichuan and Chongqing

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Zheng
  • Yao Xiong
  • Yimei Zheng
  • Haitao Zhang
  • Rui Wu

Abstract

Stroke is the leading cause of death and disability among people in China, and it leads to heavy burdens for patients, their families and society. An accurate prediction of the risk of stroke has important implications for early intervention and treatment. In light of recent advances in machine learning, the application of this technique in stroke prediction has achieved plentiful promising results. To detect the relationship between potential factors and the risk of stroke and examine which machine learning method significantly can enhance the prediction accuracy of stroke. We employed six machine learning methods including logistic regression, naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, K-nearest neighbor and support vector machine, to model and predict the risk of stroke. Participants were 233 patients from Sichuan and Chongqing. Four indicators (accuracy, precision, recall and F1 metric) were examined to evaluate the predictive performance of the different models. The empirical results indicate that random forest yields the best accuracy, recall and F1 in predicting the risk of stroke, with an accuracy of .7548, precision of .7805, recall of .7619 and F1 of .7711. Additionally, the findings show that age, cerebral infarction, PM 8 (an anti-atrial fibrillation drug), and drinking are independent risk factors for stroke. Further studies should adopt a broader assortment of machine learning methods to analyze the risk of stroke, by which better accuracy can be expected. In particular, RF can successfully enhance the forecasting accuracy for stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Zheng & Yao Xiong & Yimei Zheng & Haitao Zhang & Rui Wu, 2024. "Evaluating the Stroke Risk of Patients using Machine Learning: A New Perspective from Sichuan and Chongqing," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(2), pages 346-369, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:48:y:2024:i:2:p:346-369
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X231193468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X231193468
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X231193468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:48:y:2024:i:2:p:346-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.