IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v47y2023i5p820-870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Drury
  • Julie Goss
  • Jide Afolabi
  • Gillian McHugh
  • Norma O’Leary
  • Anne-Marie Brady

Abstract

Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of a hospice-based outpatient Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service (MBSS) in Ireland. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design guided this study. People with chronic breathlessness participated in longitudinal questionnaires ( n = 10), medical record audit ( n = 14) and a post-discharge interview ( n = 8). Caregivers ( n = 1) and healthcare professionals involved in referral to ( n = 2) and delivery of ( n = 3) the MBSS participated in a cross-sectional interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated deductively via the pillar integration process, guided by the RE-AIM framework. Integration of mixed methods data enhanced understanding of factors influencing the reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the MBSS, and the potential outcomes that were most meaningful for service users. Potential threats to the sustainability of the MBSS related to potential preconceptions of hospice care, the lack of standardized discharge pathways from the service and access to primary care services to sustain pharmacological interventions. This study suggests that an adapted multidisciplinary breathlessness support intervention is feasible and acceptable in a hospice context. However, to ensure optimal reach and maintenance of the intervention, activities are required to ensure that misconceptions about the setting do not influence willingness to accept referral to MBSS services and integration of services is needed to enable consistency in referral and discharge processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Drury & Julie Goss & Jide Afolabi & Gillian McHugh & Norma O’Leary & Anne-Marie Brady, 2023. "A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(5), pages 820-870, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:47:y:2023:i:5:p:820-870
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X231162402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X231162402
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X231162402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:47:y:2023:i:5:p:820-870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.