IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v47y2023i5p786-819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intraclass Correlations Values in International Development: Evidence Across Commonly Studied Domains in sub-Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • David Seidenfeld
  • Sudhanshu Handa
  • Thomas de Hoop
  • Mitchell Morey

Abstract

The sharp increase in the number of experimental studies evaluating development programs raises the need for accurate intraclass correlations (ICC) to conduct power calculations so that researchers can design studies to detect meaningful effects with sufficient statistical power. The intraclass correlation is an important parameter for determining the statistical power of cluster-randomized trials. The parameter is rarely available to researchers planning a study until after the design is set and data are already collected. This paper takes an important step towards helping researchers working in sub-Saharan Africa to accurately estimate appropriate sample sizes for their clustered RCTs. The study draws from rich data sets in Kenya, Malawi, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. We present ICCs for a wide range of domains common for development research. Our results suggest that ICCs for commonly studied indicators in sub-Saharan Africa are lower than is often assumed in power calculations. ICC values are especially low for indicators associated with child nutrition and food security, suggesting that cluster-RCTs might be a viable design even when faced with limited budgets because sample size requirements are not much different from an individual random assignment design.

Suggested Citation

  • David Seidenfeld & Sudhanshu Handa & Thomas de Hoop & Mitchell Morey, 2023. "Intraclass Correlations Values in International Development: Evidence Across Commonly Studied Domains in sub-Saharan Africa," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(5), pages 786-819, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:47:y:2023:i:5:p:786-819
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X231154714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X231154714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X231154714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:47:y:2023:i:5:p:786-819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.