IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v41y2017i2p111-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Structured Approach Using the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR)

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Bonardi
  • Christine J. Clifford
  • Nira Hadar

Abstract

Background: This review describes the methods used for a systematic review of oral health intervention literature in a target population (people with intellectual and developmental disability (I/DD)), which spans a broad range of interventions and study types, conducted with specialized software. Objective: The aim of this article is to demonstrate the review strategy, using the free, online systematic review data repository (SRDR) tool, for oral health interventions aimed at reducing disparities between people with I/DD and the general population. Research Design: Researchers used online title/abstract review (Abstrackr) and data extraction (SRDR) tools to structure the literature review and data extraction. A practicing clinician and an expert methodologist completed the quality review for each study. The data extraction team reported on the experience of using and customizing the SRDR. Results: Using the SRDR, the team developed four extraction templates for eight key questions and completed extraction on 125 articles. Conclusions: This report discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using an electronic tool, such as the SRDR, in completing a systematic review in an area of growing research. This review provides valuable insight for researchers who are considering the use of the SRDR.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Bonardi & Christine J. Clifford & Nira Hadar, 2017. "A Structured Approach Using the Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR)," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 111-129, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:41:y:2017:i:2:p:111-129
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X16664811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X16664811
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X16664811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:41:y:2017:i:2:p:111-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.