IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v35y2011i5p523-549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stuck Inside the Federal-Indian Funding Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Chong
  • Jeanette Hassin
  • Robert S. Young
  • Jennie R. Joe

Abstract

Two case studies are presented to compare and contrast the challenges encountered when attempting to conduct participatory evaluations (P-Es) with tribal programs that represented two extremes of collaboration between the programs and evaluators. In one case, the P-E was successful because the principals were invested in the program, whereas in the second case, the absence of a shared program vision hampered the ability to adequately evaluate the program. The authors contend that governmental funding agencies have responsibilities to ensure that their expectations are appropriate, the proposed program is feasible, and that technical assistance should be provided before the grant is written, not after it has been funded.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Chong & Jeanette Hassin & Robert S. Young & Jennie R. Joe, 2011. "Stuck Inside the Federal-Indian Funding Relationship," Evaluation Review, , vol. 35(5), pages 523-549, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:5:p:523-549
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X11428978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X11428978
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X11428978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:5:p:523-549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.