IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v35y2011i1p40-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experiment to Test the Feasibility and Quality of a Web-Based Questionnaire of Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Tepper Jacob

    (Institute for Social Research/School of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, rjacob@umich.edu)

Abstract

The use of web-based surveys to gather information from teachers has become increasingly common primarily based on the premise that they can reduce costs. Yet, relatively, little is known about the quality or cost effectiveness of web-based versus mail surveys for teachers. To study the efficacy of web-based teacher surveys, the author randomly assigned a nationally representative sample of 877 elementary school teachers to a paper or web survey mode. The cost savings from the web administration were not enough to offset the loss of sample due to missing/inaccurate email addresses and the lower response rates that resulted from the web survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Tepper Jacob, 2011. "An Experiment to Test the Feasibility and Quality of a Web-Based Questionnaire of Teachers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 35(1), pages 40-70, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:1:p:40-70
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X11399376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X11399376
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X11399376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:35:y:2011:i:1:p:40-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.