IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v27y2003i3p267-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Home Office and Random Allocation Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Nuttall

Abstract

By examining the history of the random experiment in the Home Office in the United Kingdom, this article demonstrates that research is not an altogether rational process and that fashion, personality, and politics are at least as important as science and evidence when setting research and policy programs and determining methodologies. The article also shows that even in 1970, the research world was a village and that issues and fashions on one side of it could determine the outcome of decisions on the other side, even though they had no direct relevance. On a more optimistic note, the article shows how the fashions go in cycles so that if you could not get the research funded in the last cycle, just wait 20 years for the cycle to come around and try again.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Nuttall, 2003. "The Home Office and Random Allocation Experiments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 27(3), pages 267-289, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:27:y:2003:i:3:p:267-289
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X03027003004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X03027003004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X03027003004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frans L. Leeuw & Leontien M. van der Knaap & Stefan Bogaerts, 2007. "Reducing the Knowledge--Practice Gap: A New Method Applied to Crime Prevention," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 245-250, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:27:y:2003:i:3:p:267-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.