IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v24y2000i2p212-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Remedies and Drug Control

Author

Listed:
  • Lorraine Green Mazerolle

    (University of Cincinnati)

  • James F. Price

    (Florida Atlantic University)

  • Jan Roehl

    (Justice Research Center)

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of a civil remedy program (Beat Health) on drug and disorder problems under experimental field trial conditions. Using calls for service data, the authors find statistically significant differences between the control and experimental groups, when drug problem calls prior to the start of the intervention were compared to drug calls during a 12-month follow-up period. The Beat Health sites, especially the residential sites, improved relative to the control sites. By contrast, the control treatment (patrol response) led to significant increases in drug problems, particularly at the commercial properties included in this study. The authors also examined the spatial influences of the Beat Health and patrol responses in catchment areas surrounding each of the 100 study sites. The results show some improvement in the experimental residential sites. The authors found, however, a possible displacement of drug problems in and around both the commercial experimental and control sites. They show that the displacement effect is most notable in the commercial control sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorraine Green Mazerolle & James F. Price & Jan Roehl, 2000. "Civil Remedies and Drug Control," Evaluation Review, , vol. 24(2), pages 212-241, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:24:y:2000:i:2:p:212-241
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0002400203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X0002400203
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X0002400203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:24:y:2000:i:2:p:212-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.