IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v18y1994i3p243-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjusting the U.S. Census of 1990

Author

Listed:
  • Loss Functions
  • David A. Freedman

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Kenneth W. Wachter

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • D. Richard Cutler

    (Utah State University)

  • Stephen P. Klein

    (RAND Corporation)

Abstract

Considering the difficulties, the Census Bureau does a remarkably good job at counting people. This article discusses techniques for adjusting the census. If there is a large undercount, these techniques may be accurate enough for adjustment. With a small undercount, adjustment could easily degrade the accuracy of the data. The Bureau argued that errors in the census were more serious than errors in the proposed adjustment, using "loss function analysis" to balance the risks. This procedure turns out to depend on quite unreasonable assumptions. With other and more realistic assumptions, the balance favors the census. The story has a broader moral. Statistical models are often defended on grounds of robustness. However, internally generated measures of precision may be critical. If the model is at all complicated, these measures of precision may turn out to be driven by assumptions not data—the antithesis of robustness.

Suggested Citation

  • Loss Functions & David A. Freedman & Kenneth W. Wachter & D. Richard Cutler & Stephen P. Klein, 1994. "Adjusting the U.S. Census of 1990," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(3), pages 243-280, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:18:y:1994:i:3:p:243-280
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9401800301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9401800301
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9401800301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:18:y:1994:i:3:p:243-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.