IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v17y1993i4p371-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adjusting the Census of 1990

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Freedman

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Kenneth W. Wachter

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • Daniel C. Coster

    (Utah State University)

  • D. Richard Cutler

    (Utah State University)

  • Stephen P. Klein

    (RAND Corporation)

Abstract

Considering the difficulties, the Census Bureau does a remarkably good job at counting people. This article discusses techniques for adjusting the census. If there is a large undercount, these techniques may be accurate enough for adjustment. With a small undercount, they are unlikely to improve on the census; instead, adjustment could easily degrade the accuracy of the data. The focus will be sampling error, that is, uncertainty in estimates due to the luck of the draw in choosing the sample. Sampling error is a major obstacle to adjusting the 1990 census, even at the state level. To control sampling error, the Census Bureau used a smoothing model. However, the model does not solve the problem, because its effects are strongly dependent on unverified and implausible assumptions. This story has a broader moral. Statistical models are often defended on grounds of robustness, that is, estimates do not depend strongly on assumptions. But the standard errors, which are internally generated measures of precision, may be critical. Then caution is in order. If the model is at all complicated, the standard errors may turn out to be driven by assumptions not data—the antithesis of robustness.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Freedman & Kenneth W. Wachter & Daniel C. Coster & D. Richard Cutler & Stephen P. Klein, 1993. "Adjusting the Census of 1990," Evaluation Review, , vol. 17(4), pages 371-443, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:17:y:1993:i:4:p:371-443
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9301700401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9301700401
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9301700401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Carlos Suárez Serrato & Philippe Wingender, 2016. "Estimating Local Fiscal Multipliers," NBER Working Papers 22425, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:17:y:1993:i:4:p:371-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.