IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v16y1992i5p443-463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Information Needs

Author

Listed:
  • Anna F. Lobosco

    (New York State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council)

  • Dianna L. Newman

    (University atAlbany, State University ofNew York)

Abstract

This study examined the effect of variations of program evaluation purpose and methodology on decision-making information needs of various stakeholders. Respondents provided one of three levels of service in the context of early childhood special education. The results generally supported the hypothesis that program evaluation purpose (formative or summative) and methodological approach (quantitative or qualitative) differentially affect the decision-making information needs of individuals responsible for different levels of service provision (adminis trative, direct service, or parental). These results have clear implications for evaluation practice and policy development in early childhood special education.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna F. Lobosco & Dianna L. Newman, 1992. "Stakeholder Information Needs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 16(5), pages 443-463, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:5:p:443-463
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9201600501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9201600501
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9201600501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:16:y:1992:i:5:p:443-463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.