IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v14y1990i1p91-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Nightmare in Elm City

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Morris

    (University of New Haven)

Abstract

Despite the growing attention that has been directed in recent years to the politics of evaluation, there has been little detailed analysis of the implications of this discussion for the design and supervision of students' field experiences in program evaluation. This article uses a case study of one such experience to examine some of the political issues and decisions that instructors face in this area. It is concluded that a more fully developed analytical framework is needed to address the political dynamics involved in evaluations that serve as training experiences for students.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Morris, 1990. "A Nightmare in Elm City," Evaluation Review, , vol. 14(1), pages 91-99, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:14:y:1990:i:1:p:91-99
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9001400106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9001400106
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9001400106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:14:y:1990:i:1:p:91-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.