IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v13y1989i5p435-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing Randomized Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Joan Petersilia

    (The RAND Corporation)

Abstract

Eleven jurisdictions across the country are participating in the Intensive Supervision Demon stration Projectfunded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). The demonstration is designed to assess the effects — and costs — of sentencing convicted felons to community-based programs. One of the unique aspects of the project is that it involves random assignment of offenders to intensive probation/parole supervision or control program conditions. The demonstration will run until 1990, but it has already provided instructive insights into the issues and problems involved in managing large randomized field experiments in criminal justice. The purpose of this article is to describe the programs and sites participating in the BJA Demonstration Project. The details of the RAND evaluation are then outlined, along with the data collection methods and random assignment procedures. The remaining sections describe and discuss the author's experiences, both positive and negative, in designing and evaluating the demonstration project. The author's hope is that the lessons learned from this experiment will prove instructive and help pave the way toward more refined randomized experiments in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Petersilia, 1989. "Implementing Randomized Experiments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 13(5), pages 435-458, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:13:y:1989:i:5:p:435-458
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8901300501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8901300501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8901300501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Laurence Ross & Murray Blumenthal, 1974. "Sanctions for the Drinking Driver: An Experimental Study," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(1), pages 53-62, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony J. Petrosino, 1995. "Specifying Inclusion Criteria for a Meta-Analysis," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(3), pages 274-293, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:13:y:1989:i:5:p:435-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.