IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v12y1988i3p253-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Practices of Educational Programs Reviewed By the Joint Dissemination Review Panel, 1980-1983

Author

Listed:
  • Kathleen Bodisch Lynch

    (University of Virginia)

Abstract

Practices in educational program evaluation were examined through analyses of reports submitted to the U.S. Department of Education's Joint Dissemination Review Panel (JDRP) during the years 1980-1983. Through its review process, the JDRPjudges whether educational programs have demonstrated effectiveness in attaining stated goals. Content analyses of 232 JDRP reports yielded descriptive profiles of the educational programs and their evaluations. Comparisons between JDRP-approved and nonapproved programs were made. Regression analyses were used to relate differences in evaluation methodology to differences in the size of educational effects detected by the programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathleen Bodisch Lynch, 1988. "Evaluation Practices of Educational Programs Reviewed By the Joint Dissemination Review Panel, 1980-1983," Evaluation Review, , vol. 12(3), pages 253-275, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:12:y:1988:i:3:p:253-275
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8801200303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8801200303
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8801200303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:12:y:1988:i:3:p:253-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.