IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v10y1986i2p230-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Women On Patrol

Author

Listed:
  • Merry Morash

    (Michigan State University)

  • Jack R. Greene

    (Temple University)

Abstract

This article provides an empirical analysis and a qualitative assessment of the major evaluations of policewomen's performance: A number of problems common to research on women are identified. In particular, there is a tendency to emphasize situations and characteristics associated with a male stereotype. Also, policewomen are often evaluated on criteria unrelated to police performance and in situations unrepresentative of police work. Other difficulties with evaluations of policewomen include a failure to control for Type 1 error for multiple tests; a disregard for variance in the consideration of female-male differences; disregard for workplace variation as a possible explanation of female-male differences; and the lack of methods to identify frequent tasks, important tasks, and good performance. The types of problems that characterize the research on policewomen should be avoided in evaluations of people in any jobs that are dominated by one gender group.

Suggested Citation

  • Merry Morash & Jack R. Greene, 1986. "Evaluating Women On Patrol," Evaluation Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 230-255, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:10:y:1986:i:2:p:230-255
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X8601000205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X8601000205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X8601000205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:10:y:1986:i:2:p:230-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.