IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v41y2023i7p1474-1491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ignoring people: The micro-politics of misrecognition in participatory governance

Author

Listed:
  • Nanke Verloo

Abstract

Local governments across the globe increasingly aim to engage citizens in participatory governance, encouraging them to take an active stance in community activities and policy or planning decisions. Despite the inclusive and emancipatory ambitions, these projects often reproduce inequality and exclude citizens leaving them marginalized and misrecognized. In this paper, I argue that inclusion and recognition do not take shape via political ambitions or promising institutional frameworks but via informal face-to-face interactions among citizens and state actors at the street level. By drawing on 3 years of ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, the Netherlands, I critically unpack how the engagements among state actors and citizens misrecognized the latter as political subjects. Building on critical scholarship on the politics of recognition, I propose an agent-centered and practice-oriented approach that analyzes the micro-politics of misrecognition via (1) narrative analysis, (2) the detailed analysis of speech acts and emotional expressions, and (3) with a specific focus on analyzing the spatial practices that construe the geopolitical realm. As a result, I introduce the tactic of ‘ignoring people’ as a socio-spatial practice of politics. I found five socio-spatial tactics by which citizens were ignored during the very participatory process in which they were invited: disregarded elements of citizens’ stories, omitting their counter-narrative, neglecting citizens’ memories, showing disdain for their emotional expressions and being spatially absent from their protest. These insights require scholars interested in understanding the exclusive mechanisms of citizen participation, to turn to the micro-politics of interaction where the political is practiced and experienced.

Suggested Citation

  • Nanke Verloo, 2023. "Ignoring people: The micro-politics of misrecognition in participatory governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(7), pages 1474-1491, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:7:p:1474-1491
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544231182985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544231182985
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544231182985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valeria Monno & Abdul Khakee, 2012. "Tokenism or Political Activism? Some Reflections on Participatory Planning," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 85-101.
    2. Tjitske Akkerman & Maarten Hajer & John Grin, 2004. "The Interactive State: Democratisation from Above?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 52(1), pages 82-95, March.
    3. Wolfgang Zierhofer, 2002. "Speech Acts and Space(s): Language Pragmatics and the Discursive Constitution of the Social," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(8), pages 1355-1372, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huib Ernste, 2004. "The Pragmatism of Life in Poststructuralist Times," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(3), pages 437-450, March.
    2. Pataki, György & Bajmócy, Zoltán & Málovics, György & Gébert, Judit, 2019. "Miről szól(hatna) a felelősségteljes kutatás és innováció?. Rendszerkonform versus transzformatív megközelítés [What is responsible research and innovation about? Contrasting the reform and transfo," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 286-304.
    3. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    4. Michael G. Hunter & Alessandro Soro & Ross A. Brown & Joel Harman & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2022. "Augmenting Community Engagement in City 4.0: Considerations for Digital Agency in Urban Public Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Wiebren Kuindersma & Froukje G Boonstra, 2010. "The Changing Role of the State in Dutch Regional Partnerships," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(6), pages 1045-1062, December.
    6. Jialing Yan & Yan Huang & Shuying Tan & Wei Lang & Tingting Chen, 2023. "Jointly Creating Sustainable Rural Communities through Participatory Planning: A Case Study of Fengqing County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Martina Schretzenmayr & Simona Casaulta-Meyer, 2016. "Learning through communicating with the public," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 552-567, October.
    8. Mandy Lau, 2014. "Flexibility with a Purpose: Constructing the Legitimacy of Spatial Governance Partnerships," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(9), pages 1943-1959, July.
    9. Roos Pijpers & Martin Van Der Velde, 2007. "Mobility across Borders: Contextualizing Local Strategies to Circumvent Visa and Work Permit Requirements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 819-835, December.
    10. Philippe Koch, 2013. "Bringing Power Back In: Collective and Distributive Forms of Power in Public Participation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(14), pages 2976-2992, November.
    11. Torill Nyseth & Torill Ringholm & Annika Agger, 2019. "Innovative Forms of Citizen Participation at the Fringe of the Formal Planning System," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 7-18.
    12. Erik Swyngedouw, 2005. "Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 1991-2006, October.
    13. Laes, Erik & Mayeres, Inge & Renders, Nele & Valkering, Pieter & Verbeke, Stijn, 2018. "How do policies help to increase the uptake of carbon reduction measures in the EU residential sector? Evidence from recent studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 234-250.
    14. Markus Hanisch & Tuba Inal-Çekiç, 2014. "Cooperative Response to Urban Transformation: Lessons from Istanbul," ERSA conference papers ersa14p228, European Regional Science Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:41:y:2023:i:7:p:1474-1491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.