IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v40y2022i2p502-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with violence: Varied reactions from frontline workers acting in highly vulnerable territories

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Lotta
  • Fernanda Lima-Silva

    (Getulio Vargas Foundation, Brazil)

  • Arilson Favareto

Abstract

This paper aims to understand the multiple strategies developed by frontline workers to deal with situations of violence in vulnerable territories. We analyze the micro-dynamics within which workers operate to understand how the State deals with violence. Empirically, we analyzed data from interviews with 140 frontline workers implementing different policies not directly related to violence in neighborhoods located in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil, known for their populations’ precariousness and vulnerability. The results expand the understanding of the different ways in which violence expresses itself in these places and show that the reactions developed by frontline workers are more complex than those suggested by the existing literature. The multiple violence to which these workers are exposed is used and manipulated by them in various ways during policy implementation. Frontline workers can ignore, negotiate with, or combat violence. They use their agency to develop different reactions based on how they and the policies are embedded or disconnected to the territories.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Lotta & Fernanda Lima-Silva & Arilson Favareto, 2022. "Dealing with violence: Varied reactions from frontline workers acting in highly vulnerable territories," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(2), pages 502-519, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:502-519
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544211031560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544211031560
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544211031560?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ting Gong & Paul Collins & Hon Chan & Xiaowei Zang, 2017. "How Cohesive is the Chinese Bureaucracy? A Case Study of Street‐level Bureaucrats in China," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(3), pages 217-226, August.
    2. Rachel M. Gisselquist & Danielle Resnick & Otwin Marenin, 2014. "Styles Of Policing And Economic Development In African States," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(3), pages 149-161, August.
    3. Paul Collins & Otwin Marenin & Michael Chin‐Chih Chu & Rogerio F. Pinto & Maria Scarlet Do Carmo, 2016. "The Pacifying Police Units of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UPPs): Incremental Innovation or Police Reform?," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 36(2), pages 121-131, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:502-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.