IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v33y2015i4p780-793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering meaningful partnerships in public–private partnerships: innovations in partnership design and process management to create value

Author

Listed:
  • David J Roberts
  • Matti Siemiatycki

Abstract

While public–private partnerships have become increasingly popular for delivering large-scale public infrastructure around the world, a common critique is that the structure of the relationship is typically more akin to contracting out than a truly meaningful collaboration between the partners. In this paper we aim to demonstrate how innovative public–private partnership models can be designed to deepen cooperation and deliver project outcomes that are better than any one partner could achieve on their own. To support our argument, we analyze the case study of a novel partnership between the Toronto District School Board and a condominium developer to redevelop a public high school in Toronto. Our results show that a process management orientation to partnership can build trust between the partners, effectively share project risks, and foster the public support necessary to realize controversial projects.

Suggested Citation

  • David J Roberts & Matti Siemiatycki, 2015. "Fostering meaningful partnerships in public–private partnerships: innovations in partnership design and process management to create value," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(4), pages 780-793, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:780-793
    DOI: 10.1068/c12250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c12250
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c12250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khadaroo, Iqbal, 2008. "The actual evaluation of school PFI bids for value for money in the UK public sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(8), pages 1321-1345.
    2. Eoin Reeves & James Ryan, 2007. "Piloting Public-Private Partnerships: Expensive Lessons from Ireland's Schools' Sector," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 331-338, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Demirag, Istemi & Khadaroo, Iqbal & Stapleton, Pamela & Stevenson, Caral, 2011. "Risks and the financing of PPP: Perspectives from the financiers," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 294-310.
    2. Carvalho, João & Cruz, Nuno & Cunha Marques, Rui, 2010. "Local governments opting for PPPs in the schools sector," MPRA Paper 22558, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Paul du Gay & Yuval Millo & Penelope Tuck, 2012. "Making Government Liquid: Shifts in Governance Using Financialisation as a Political Device," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(6), pages 1083-1099, December.
    4. Ranjith Appuhami & Sujatha Perera & Hector Perera, 2011. "Management Controls in Public–Private Partnerships: An Analytical Framework," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 21(1), pages 64-79, March.
    5. Joshua Steinfeld & Ron Carlee & Kouliga Koala, 2020. "DBFOM Contracting and Public Stewardship in the Norfolk-Portsmouth Elizabeth River Tunnels Public-Private Partnership," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 37-62, March.
    6. Cian O'SHEA & Dónal PALCIC & Eoin REEVES, 2019. "Comparing Ppp With Traditional Procurement: The Case Of Schools Procurement In Ireland," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 245-267, June.
    7. Salvatore Russo, 2013. "The swing of public-private partnership in the Italian hospitals. A comparative analysis of two case studies," Working Papers 21, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    8. Peda, Peeter & Vinnari, Eija, 2020. "The discursive legitimation of profit in public-private service delivery," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    9. Khadaroo, Iqbal, 2014. "The valuation of risk transfer in UK school public private partnership contracts," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 154-165.
    10. Daniel Albalate & Germ� Bel & R. Richard Geddes, 2015. "The determinants of contractual choice for private involvement in infrastructure projects," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 87-94, January.
    11. Cuthbert, J.R. & Cuthbert, M., 2012. "Why IRR is an inadequate indicator of costs and returns in relation to PFI schemes," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 420-433.
    12. Aparajita Banerjee & Enda Murphy & Patrick Paul Walsh, 2020. "Perceptions of Multistakeholder Partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Irish Non-State Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    13. Morales, Jérémy & Sponem, Samuel, 2017. "You too can have a critical perspective! 25 years of Critical Perspectives on Accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 149-166.
    14. Tony Bovaird, 2010. "A Brief Intellectual History of the Public–Private Partnership Movement," Chapters, in: Graeme A. Hodge & Carsten Greve & Anthony E. Boardman (ed.), International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:780-793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.