IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v48y2021i6p1558-1573.html

Enhancing citizen engagement in planning through participatory film-making

Author

Listed:
  • Jen Manuel
  • Geoff Vigar

Abstract

There is a long history of engaging citizens in planning processes, and the intention to involve them actively in planning is a common objective. However, the reality of doing so is rather fraught and much empirical work suggests poor results. Partly in response an increasingly sophisticated toolkit of methods has emerged, and, in recent years, the deployment of various creative and digital technologies has enhanced this toolkit. We report here on case study research that deployed participatory film-making to augment a process of neighbourhood planning. We conclude that such a technology can elicit issues that might be missed in traditional planning processes; provoke key actors to include more citizens in the process by highlighting existing absences in the knowledge base; and, finally, provoke greater deliberation on issues by providing spaces for reflection and debate. We note, however, that while participants in film-making were positive about the experience, such creative methods were side-lined as established forms of technical–rational planning reasserted themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Jen Manuel & Geoff Vigar, 2021. "Enhancing citizen engagement in planning through participatory film-making," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(6), pages 1558-1573, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:6:p:1558-1573
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808320936280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808320936280
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808320936280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phil Jones & Antonia Layard & Chris Speed & Colin Lorne, 2015. "MapLocal: Use of Smartphones for Crowdsourced Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 322-336, June.
    2. Howell Baum, 2015. "Planning with half a mind: Why planners resist emotion," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 498-516, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juliet Carpenter, 2022. "Picture This: Exploring Photovoice as a Method to Understand Lived Experiences in Marginal Neighbourhoods," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 351-362.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cecilie Sachs Olsen & Krzysztof Janas & Lisa De Roeck & Barbara Koole & Cato Janssen & Merlijn van Hulst & Celine Motzfeldt Loades, 2026. "Estrangement, embodiment and entanglement: Putting agonistic planning into practice through Urban Drama Labs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(3), pages 524-541, February.
    2. C Erik Vergel-Tovar & Eric Goldwyn & Jonathan Leape, 2023. "Digital traces: Mapping Bogotá’s unmapped transit network using smartphones and networked databases," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(2), pages 469-486, February.
    3. Alex Lord & Philip O’Brien, 2017. "What price planning? Reimagining planning as “market maker”," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 217-232, April.
    4. Enzo Falco & Reinout Kleinhans, 2018. "Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 52-79, July.
    5. Sundaresan, Jayaraj & John, Benjamin, 2021. "Emotions, planning and co-production: distrust, anger and fear at participatory boundaries in Bengaluru," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107064, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Melissa VanSickle & Christopher Coutts, 2022. "Considerations for Children’s Nature Connection and Park Environmental Justice in Western Societies," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, August.
    7. María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández & Daniel Álvarez-Bassi & José Ramón-Cardona, 2020. "Management of Tourist Destinations: The Expectations of Guests on eWOM Generation in Maldonado (Uruguay)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Jesse Fox & Talia Margalit, 2026. "Beyond the professional–local knowledge dichotomy: Toward a new epistemology in urban planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(5), pages 869-890, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:6:p:1558-1573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.