IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v48y2021i4p861-879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of ‘publicness’ and quality of publicly accessible open space upon user satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel CW Ho

    (Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong (THEi), Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Lawrence WC Lai

    (25809University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Anqi Wang

    (Technological and Higher Education Institute of Hong Kong (THEi), Hong Kong SAR, China)

Abstract

There is a worldwide trend for planning bodies to allow, require, or encourage developers to provide open spaces in their properties for public enjoyment to complement the open spaces on government lands. The two types of privately owned open space and government-owned open space, both accessible to public, can influence on people’s quality of life. Whether and how the land ownership of open spaces would influence their performance and, in turn, affect user satisfaction has not yet been studied and is worthy of exploration. This paper aims to examine the interactive relationships among three variables: ‘publicness’, quality/performance, and user satisfaction in both types of open space in Hong Kong. A questionnaire survey was administered to users of privately owned open space and government-owned open space and found that satisfaction with government-owned open space was marginally higher than with privately owned open space, with respect to activity facilities, amenities, and the overall utilization. Nevertheless, the differences in satisfaction were mainly the result of open space quality rather than land ownership per se. This study also examines the determinants of satisfaction, open space provision, and management and trends in spatial use. Findings from this study can deepen the understanding of utilizing both government-owned open space and privately owned open space from the user’s perspective, which will help improve the planning, design, and management of open spaces in cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel CW Ho & Lawrence WC Lai & Anqi Wang, 2021. "The effects of ‘publicness’ and quality of publicly accessible open space upon user satisfaction," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 861-879, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:861-879
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808320903733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808320903733
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808320903733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Te-Sheng Huang & Karen A. Franck, 2018. "Let’s meet at Citicorp: can privately owned public spaces be inclusive?," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 499-517, July.
    2. Evangelia Athanassiou, 2017. "The hybrid landscape of public space in Thessaloniki in the context of crisis," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 782-794, October.
    3. Lawrence W. C. Lai & Frank T. Lorne, 2019. "Sustainable Urban Renewal and Built Heritage Conservation in a Global Real Estate Revolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Nachmany, Harel & Hananel, Ravit, 2019. "A tale of two neighborhoods: Toward a new typology of land rights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 233-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zelin Zhang & Xiaomin Tang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Intergenerational Equity of Public Open Space in Old Communities: A Case Study of Caoyang New Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Nachmany, Harel & Hananel, Ravit, 2023. "The Urban Renewal Matrix," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Leung Kwok Prudence Lau & Pak Yin Ophios Chow, 2019. "The Right to Landscape: Social Sustainability and the Conservation of the State Theatre, Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Lawrence W. C. Lai & K. W. Chau, 2022. "Land Surveying and Squatting," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Ravit Hananel, 2021. "Bills, Rights and Housing Policy: The Evolution of Israel’s Seven-Decade Housing-Related Bills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Yang Bai & Wei Zhou & Yanjun Guan & Xue Li & Baohua Huang & Fengchun Lei & Hong Yang & Wenmin Huo, 2020. "Evolution of Policy Concerning the Readjustment of Inefficient Urban Land Use in China Based on a Content Analysis Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    7. M. Francisca Lima & Catharine Ward Thompson & Peter Aspinall, 2020. "Friendly Communities and Outdoor Spaces in Contexts of Urban Population Decline," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    8. Agnieszka Starzyk & Kinga Rybak-Niedziółka & Janusz Marchwiński & Ewa Rykała & Elena Lucchi, 2023. "Spatial Relations between the Theatre and Its Surroundings: An Assessment Protocol on the Example of Warsaw (Poland)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Giannis Sotiriou & Chryssanthi (Christy) Petropoulou, 2022. "Socio-Spatial Inequalities, and Local Struggles for the Right to the City and to Nature—Cases of Urban Green Parks in Athens," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Lawrence W.C. Lai & Stephen N.G. Davies & Frank T. Lorne, 2019. "Trialogue on Built Heritage and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-10, July.
    11. KW Chau & Lawrence WC Lai & Mark H Chua, 2022. "Post-colonial conservation of colonial built heritage in Hong Kong: A statistical analysis of historic building grading," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 671-686, February.
    12. Bohong Zheng & Francis Masrabaye & Gerald Madjissembaye Guiradoumngué & Jian Zheng & Linlin Liu, 2021. "Progress in Research on Sustainable Urban Renewal Since 2000: Library and Visual Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-28, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:861-879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.