IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v26y1999i5p643-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Cooperative Environmental Planning Mandates Produce Good Plans? Empirical Results from the New Zealand Experience

Author

Listed:
  • P R Berke

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3140, USA)

  • J Crawford

    (Planning Consultants Ltd, PO Box 99834, Newmarket, Auckland 1035, New Zealand)

  • J Dixon

    (Department of Resource and Environmental Planning, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand)

  • N Ericksen

    (The International Global Change Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand)

Abstract

Cooperative mandates represent new thinking about intergovernmental relationships and a shift from the top-down coercive approach. This research presents evidence on how a cooperative national environmental management mandate influences the quality of regional and district plans in New Zealand. Findings indicate that cooperative planning mandates such as New Zealand's Resource Management Act are difficult to translate into practice. The quality of regional and district plans was unimpressive. Empirical modelling shows that clear legislative provisions, the information dissemination strategies of central government, and subnational organisational capacity had an important impact on regional and district plan quality. Alternatively, the organisational capacity and plans of regional councils have little influence on the capacity and plans of district councils. These findings suggest that, though clear mandates are effective, more attention needs to be given to building subnational organisational capacity and to improving the information provision efforts of central government. More attention also needs to be directed to facilitating collaboration between regional and district councils.

Suggested Citation

  • P R Berke & J Crawford & J Dixon & N Ericksen, 1999. "Do Cooperative Environmental Planning Mandates Produce Good Plans? Empirical Results from the New Zealand Experience," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(5), pages 643-664, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:26:y:1999:i:5:p:643-664
    DOI: 10.1068/b260643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b260643
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b260643?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Foster, Michaela & Peterson, M. Nils & Cubbage, Frederick & McMahon, Gerard, 2019. "Evaluating natural resource planning for longleaf pine ecosystems in the Southeast United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 142-153.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:26:y:1999:i:5:p:643-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.