IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v19y1987i8p1015-1025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Policy and Review 18. Losing Ground—Or Losing Credibility? An Examination of a Recent Policy Debate in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • S E Clarke

    (Center for Policy Studies, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA)

  • A M Kirby

    (Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA)

  • R F McNown

    (Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA)

Abstract

This policy review is an examination of Charles Murray's Losing Ground , which is an investigation of the progress made by US blacks since 1950. The author purports to show that blacks have made little headway in terms of educational progress and income expectations, and are ‘losing ground’ within US society. A critical evaluation of Murray's research shows that he has focused on microeconomic issues at the expense of a consideration of wider structural changes, and that the book is thus flawed in a number of ways. This notwithstanding, the book has been successful, in that it has engendered academic analysis and political debate. It is inferred that, as an exercise in policy development, Murray has had a major impact exactly because he has offered a simplistic approach to his material. It is argued that this challenges what is regarded as the typical practice of scholarly research, publication, and discussion. The book constitutes an important yet distressing example for those who have aspirations for influencing the course of policy generation.

Suggested Citation

  • S E Clarke & A M Kirby & R F McNown, 1987. "Research Policy and Review 18. Losing Ground—Or Losing Credibility? An Examination of a Recent Policy Debate in the United States," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 19(8), pages 1015-1025, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:19:y:1987:i:8:p:1015-1025
    DOI: 10.1068/a191015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a191015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a191015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M J Breheny, 1989. "Chalkface to Coalface: A Review of the Academic — Practice Interface," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 16(4), pages 451-468, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:19:y:1987:i:8:p:1015-1025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.