IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v33y2022i8p1679-1694.html

Government cooperation, market integration, and energy efficiency in urban agglomerations—Based on the quasi-natural experiment of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Economic Coordination Committee

Author

Listed:
  • Da Gao
  • Ge Li
  • Yi Li

Abstract

Energy efficiency is the key to green development, and the government plays a vital role in energy efficiency. This paper clarifies the mechanism by which the Yangtze River Delta Economic Coordination Committee affects the energy efficiency of urban agglomeration by promoting market integration. Based on panel data of China's prefecture-level cities from 2004 to 2017, we take the Yangtze River Delta Economic Coordination Committee as a quasi-natural experiment of government cooperation and use the difference-in-difference method to test whether this organization has enhanced the energy efficiency of urban agglomeration. The results show that the Yangtze River Delta Economic Coordination Committee can significantly improve energy efficiency in urban agglomerations. The mechanism analysis shows that it reduces the energy consumption per unit of gross domestic product by enhancing the marketization level, perfecting the relationship between the government and the market, and improving the factor market development. The heterogeneity analysis shows that cities with lower city size, lower level of innovation, and cleaner industrial structures gain more benefits in energy efficiency from government cooperation in urban agglomeration. This paper provides empirical evidence for cities to realize integrated energy conservation through government cooperation and market integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Da Gao & Ge Li & Yi Li, 2022. "Government cooperation, market integration, and energy efficiency in urban agglomerations—Based on the quasi-natural experiment of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Economic Coordination Committee," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(8), pages 1679-1694, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:33:y:2022:i:8:p:1679-1694
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X211047480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X211047480
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X211047480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Bangzhu & Zhang, Mengfan & Zhou, Yanhua & Wang, Ping & Sheng, Jichuan & He, Kaijian & Wei, Yi-Ming & Xie, Rui, 2019. "Exploring the effect of industrial structure adjustment on interprovincial green development efficiency in China: A novel integrated approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Fan, Ruguo & Luo, Ming & Zhang, Pengfei, 2016. "A study on evolution of energy intensity in China with heterogeneity and rebound effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 159-169.
    3. Da Gao & Yi Li & Qiuyue Yang, 2021. "Can pollution charges reform promote industrial SO2 emissions reduction?—Evidence from 189 China’s cities," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(1), pages 96-112, February.
    4. Liu, Qing & Qiu, Larry D., 2016. "Intermediate input imports and innovations: Evidence from Chinese firms' patent filings," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 166-183.
    5. Chen, Xudong & Huang, Bihong, 2016. "Club membership and transboundary pollution: Evidence from the European Union enlargement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 230-237.
    6. He, Weijun & Wang, Bo & Danish, & Wang, Zhaohua, 2018. "Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 263-274.
    7. Pan, Xiongfeng & Ai, Bowei & Li, Changyu & Pan, Xianyou & Yan, Yaobo, 2019. "Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 428-435.
    8. Lin, Boqiang & Chen, Yu, 2019. "Will economic infrastructure development affect the energy intensity of China's manufacturing industry?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 122-131.
    9. Yanjun Yang & Rui Xue & Dong Yang, 2020. "Does market segmentation necessarily discourage energy efficiency?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Pan, Xiongfeng & Guo, Shucen & Han, Cuicui & Wang, Mengyang & Song, Jinbo & Liao, Xianchun, 2020. "Influence of FDI quality on energy efficiency in China based on seemingly unrelated regression method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Huang, Junbing & Chen, Xiang, 2020. "Domestic R&D activities, technology absorption ability, and energy intensity in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Ke, Shanzi, 2015. "Domestic Market Integration and Regional Economic Growth—China’s Recent Experience from 1995–2011," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 588-597.
    13. Lu, Yi & Tao, Zhigang & Zhu, Lianming, 2017. "Identifying FDI spillovers," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 75-90.
    14. Hua, Yue & Xie, Rui & Su, Yaqin, 2018. "Fiscal spending and air pollution in Chinese cities: Identifying composition and technique effects," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 156-169.
    15. Jiang, Xuemei & Duan, Yuwan & Green, Christopher, 2017. "Regional disparity in energy intensity of China and the role of industrial and export structure," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 209-218.
    16. Li, Jianglong & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-378.
    17. Schleich, Joachim, 2019. "Energy efficient technology adoption in low-income households in the European Union – What is the evidence?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 196-206.
    18. Patterson, Murray G, 1996. "What is energy efficiency? : Concepts, indicators and methodological issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 377-390, May.
    19. Poumanyvong, Phetkeo & Kaneko, Shinji, 2010. "Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 434-444, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiayuan Zhou & Yunxia Li & Bo Li, 2022. "Restructure or Misallocation? Enterprises’ Carbon Emission Intensity under Market Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Liu, Ji & Xu, Zheng & Zhang, Jing & Zhou, Kun, 2025. "Can market competition enhance the utilization of data elements? Analysis from the dual perspectives of managerial incentives and entrepreneurial orientation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Xiong, Yongqing & Cheng, Qian, 2023. "Effects of new energy vehicle adoption on provincial energy efficiency in China: From the perspective of regional imbalances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    4. Qiang Wang & Chen Zhang & Rongrong Li, 2025. "Does renewable energy consumption improve carbon efficiency? Evidence from 116 countries," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(2), pages 807-828, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Da & Li, Ge & Yu, Jiyu, 2022. "Does digitization improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from Chinese 213 cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Su, Hongwei & Liang, Biming, 2021. "The impact of regional market integration and economic opening up on environmental total factor energy productivity in Chinese provinces," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    3. Yanjun Yang & Rui Xue & Dong Yang, 2020. "Does market segmentation necessarily discourage energy efficiency?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Sijia Li & Lihua Wu, 2024. "The impact of regional integration on PM2.5 concentrations—Quasi‐natural experimental evidence from city economic coordination committee," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), September.
    5. Xiaohong Liu & Meiwen Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Market Integration on Renewable Energy Technology Innovation: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Xue, Yan & Tang, Chang & Wu, Haitao & Liu, Jianmin & Hao, Yu, 2022. "The emerging driving force of energy consumption in China: Does digital economy development matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Yi Feng & Diyun Peng & Yafei Li & Shuai Liu, 2024. "Can regional integration reduce carbon intensity? Evidence from city cluster in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5249-5274, February.
    8. Xianjia Wang & Can Wang & Linzhao Xue, 2025. "Co-evolution of regional integration and green innovation under two-layer network," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(2), pages 565-591, March.
    9. Yu Xiang & Jing Zheng & Xunhua Tu, 2022. "The Impact of Intermediate Goods Imports on Energy Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Kun Zheng & Hongbing Deng & Kangni Lyu & Shuang Yang & Yu Cao, 2022. "Market Integration, Industrial Structure, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Lin, Boqiang & Zhou, Yicheng, 2021. "How does vertical fiscal imbalance affect the upgrading of industrial structure? Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Haochang Yang & Faming Zhang & Yixin He, 2021. "Exploring the effect of producer services and manufacturing industrial co-agglomeration on the ecological environment pollution control in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16119-16144, November.
    13. Yin, Chong & Su, Xiao-ni & Wang, Wen-chao & Cui, Ying-xin, 2024. "Structural imbalance and integrated economic development of RCEP countries on perspective of industrial network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Nian Wang & Yingming Zhu & Yu Pei, 2021. "How does economic infrastructure affect industrial energy efficiency convergence? Empirical evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13973-13997, September.
    15. Li, Qihang & Zhang, Quanfei, 2025. "Administrative division adjustment and enterprise carbon emissions: Evidence from City-County Merger in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Zihan Hu & Min Wu & Dan Yang & Tao Luo & Yihao Tian, 2024. "How Resource-Exhausted Cities Get Out of the Innovation Bottom? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Hou, Xinshuo & He, Yan & Liu, Xin & Li, Dongyang & Zhang, Shijie, 2025. "Market segmentation and urban energy consumption: An analysis of threshold effects from an agglomeration perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Dongsheng Yan & Pingxing Li, 2023. "Can Regional Integration Reduce Urban Carbon Emission? An Empirical Study Based on the Yangtze River Delta, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-25, January.
    19. Kang, Jijun & Yu, Chenyang & Xue, Rui & Yang, Dong & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Can regional integration narrow city-level energy efficiency gap in China?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    20. Yang, Zhihao & Hong, Junjie, 2021. "Trade policy uncertainty and energy intensity: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:33:y:2022:i:8:p:1679-1694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.