IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v27y2026i1p196-204.html

Studying party-voter congruence in the European elections 2024: Introducing a new dataset on German voter positions from the VAA ‘Europartycheck’

Author

Listed:
  • J Philipp Thomeczek
  • L Constantin Wurthmann
  • Christian Stecker

Abstract

We introduce a new dataset to study party-voter congruence in the European Elections 2024 in Germany. It contains party and voter positions on identical issues and scales collected using the voting advice application (VAA) ‘Europartycheck’, with over 40,000 users, and party positions from the ‘GEPARTEE’ expert survey. We present various steps to improve data quality. Besides data cleaning, we calculate weights to mitigate the selection bias in VAA usage and provide a VAA-quota sample ( n  =   2,000) that more closely resembles the German population. We provide example analyses for European Union items, left–right self-placement, and party-voter congruence for various voter groups (including voters of smaller parties such as Volt). A rich set of socio-demographic and additional variables, including populism, institutional trust, propensity to vote, and Euroscepticism, provides researchers with an important complement to existing datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • J Philipp Thomeczek & L Constantin Wurthmann & Christian Stecker, 2026. "Studying party-voter congruence in the European elections 2024: Introducing a new dataset on German voter positions from the VAA ‘Europartycheck’," European Union Politics, , vol. 27(1), pages 196-204, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:196-204
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165251395306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165251395306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/14651165251395306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindstädt, René & Proksch, Sven-Oliver & Slapin, Jonathan B., 2020. "When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and its Consequences in Expert Surveys," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 580-588, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Bassi, 2021. "Parties’ Preferences for Office and Policy Goals," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Ali Fisunoglu & Kyungkook Kang & Tad Kugler & Marina Arbetman-Rabinowitz, 2023. "Relative political capacity: A dataset to evaluate the performance of nations, 1960–2018," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(3), pages 325-345, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:27:y:2026:i:1:p:196-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.