IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v47y2026i2p382-403.html

Why are employees most susceptible to automation least likely to retrain? Automation risks and inequalities in learning intention, perceived opportunities, and learning participation among employee groups

Author

Listed:
  • Giedo Jansen

    (University of Amsterdam, AIAS-HSI, Faculty of Law, Netherlands)

  • Suzanne Janssen

    (University of Twente, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences (BMS), Netherlands)

  • Mark Levels
  • Marie-Christine Fregin

    (Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA), Netherlands)

Abstract

The rise of intelligent technologies is believed to change job requirements, urging individuals to engage in work-related learning to stay employable. Studies on workers’ learning participation found that employees who are most at risk of automation are least likely to engage in work-related learning. To better understand this paradox, this study investigates to what extent differences in work-related learning for technological adaptation are explained by (a) workers’ actual automation risk, (b) their subjective perception of automation risks, (c) differences in their learning intention, and (d) access to lifelong development opportunities and supportive learning environments. Novel survey data on Dutch employees ( N = 1,719) are used. The results based on (generalized) structural equation modeling show that differences in learning between high- and low-risk workers can be explained by workers’ differences in their learning intentions and their (perceived) access to education and supportive learning environments, but not by their subjective perceptions of automation.

Suggested Citation

  • Giedo Jansen & Suzanne Janssen & Mark Levels & Marie-Christine Fregin, 2026. "Why are employees most susceptible to automation least likely to retrain? Automation risks and inequalities in learning intention, perceived opportunities, and learning participation among employee groups," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 47(2), pages 382-403, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:47:y:2026:i:2:p:382-403
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X251331749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X251331749
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X251331749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:47:y:2026:i:2:p:382-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.