IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v46y2025i2p448-468.html

‘What damage could a small breeze do to a fence?’ The lack of collective action on ride-hailing platforms in Berlin and Tallinn

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Animento

    (Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany)

  • Kairit Kall

    (Tallinn University, Estonia)

  • Valentin Niebler

    (Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany)

  • Marge Unt

    (Tallinn University, Estonia)

  • Triin Roosalu

    (Tallinn University, Estonia)

  • Liis Ojamäe

    (Tallinn University and Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia)

Abstract

The proliferation of ride-hailing platforms in the last decade has been challenged by workers’ mobilization around the world. In order to complement the existing research on successful organizing, in this article the authors investigate the lack of collective resistance in two cases. By comparing the ride-hailing industry in Berlin (Germany) and Tallinn (Estonia), the authors explain the absence of collective mobilization in these different contexts. While ride-hailing in Berlin is more regulated than in Tallinn, drivers in both cities are structurally located in the weakest position within labour relations. Their isolation presents common features found in the business model and the work process, but also within wider societal structures and ideological landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Animento & Kairit Kall & Valentin Niebler & Marge Unt & Triin Roosalu & Liis Ojamäe, 2025. "‘What damage could a small breeze do to a fence?’ The lack of collective action on ride-hailing platforms in Berlin and Tallinn," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 46(2), pages 448-468, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:448-468
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X241259529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X241259529
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X241259529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heiland, Heiner, 2020. "Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview," WSI Studies 21, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Wood, Alex & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2021. "Antagonism beyond employment: how the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy," SocArXiv y943w, Center for Open Science.
    3. Valerio De Stefano & Ilda Durri & Charalampos Stylogiannis & Mathias Wouters, 2022. "Introduction to A Research Agenda for the Gig Economy and Society," Chapters, in: Valerio De Stefano & Ilda Durri & Charalampos Stylogiannis & Mathias Wouters (ed.), A Research Agenda for the Gig Economy and Society, chapter 1, pages 1-12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Michelle O'Sullivan & Thomas Turner, 2013. "Facilitators and Inhibitors of Collective Action: A Case Study of a US-Owned Manufacturing Plant," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 689-708, December.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:y943w_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Stephan Lanz, 2013. "Be Berlin! Governing the City through Freedom," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1305-1324, July.
    7. Julieta Haidar, 2023. "The multidimensional configuration of platform work: A mixed-methods analysis of the Argentinian case," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(4), pages 938-963, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heiland, Heiner & Seeliger, Martin, 2022. "Betriebliche Öffentlichkeiten im Strukturwandel als Ausgangspunkt einer Demokratisierung der Arbeit?," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 39/2022, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    2. Andrea Borello, 2025. "Structural Unfairness or Disrespect and Misrecognition? Theorising the Pathway Between Feelings of Injustice and Collective Mobilisation Among Precarious Migrant Workers," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(3), pages 413-426, September.
    3. Sandra Huning & Nina Schuster, 2015. "‘Social Mixing' or ‘Gentrification'? Contradictory Perspectives on Urban Change in the Berlin District of Neukölln," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 738-755, July.
    4. Maurizio Atzeni & Lorenzo Cini, 2024. "New theories and politics for working class organizing in the gig and precarious world of work," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(3), pages 937-958, August.
    5. Arianna Tassinari & Vincenzo Maccarrone, 2020. "Riders on the Storm: Workplace Solidarity among Gig Economy Couriers in Italy and the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 35-54, February.
    6. Xhafa, Edlira & Serrano, Melisa R., 2024. "Workers in informal employment organising and acting collectively: The role of trade unions," GLU Working Papers 59, Global Labour University (GLU).
    7. Alex J Wood & Nicholas Martindale & Brendan J Burchell, 2025. "Beyond the ‘Gig Economy’: Towards Variable Experiences of Job Quality in Platform Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1154-1178, October.
    8. Cirillo, Valeria & Guarascio, Dario & Parolin, Zachary, 2023. "Platform work and economic insecurity in Italy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 126-138.
    9. Leonard Geyer & Kurt Vandaele & Nicolas Prinz, 2024. "Riding together? Why app-mediated food delivery couriers join trade unions in Austria," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(3), pages 835-858, August.
    10. Ariela Micha & Martín Trombetta & Francisca Pereyra, 2024. "Digital Labor Platforms, Domestic Work and Formalization: Evidence from Argentina," Working Papers 330, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    11. Ewen, Janis & Heiland, Heiner & Seeliger, Martin, 2022. "Dynamiken autonomer Arbeitskonflikte im digitalen Kapitalismus: Der Fall "Gorillas"," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 33/2022, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    12. Paul Edwards & Andy Hodder, 2022. "Conflict and control in the contemporary workplace: Structured antagonism revisited," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 220-240, May.
    13. Stephan Lanz & Martijn Oosterbaan, 2016. "Entrepreneurial Religion in the Age of Neoliberal Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 487-506, May.
    14. Fabian Stephany & Otto Kassi & Uma Rani & Vili Lehdonvirta, 2021. "Online Labour Index 2020: New ways to measure the world's remote freelancing market," Papers 2105.09148, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    15. Bingham, Logan Robert, 2021. "Vittel as a model case in PES discourse: Review and critical perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    16. Davide Arcidiacono & Cecilia Manzo, 2024. "Contingent workers and innovative digital collective action in Europe. Exploring inclusiveness through political intersectionality," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 30(4), pages 487-502, November.
    17. Gregor Gall, 2018. "The uses, abuses and non-uses of Rethinking Industrial Relations in understanding industrial relations and organised labour," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 681-700, November.
    18. Daina Bellido de Luna, 2026. "Regulatory influence on the overall quality of platform work: Lessons from the Chilean context," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 47(1), pages 196-217, February.
    19. Elisabeth Bethge, 2025. "Voices Beyond the Road: Comparison of Online Employee Voice in Traditional Transport and the Ride-Sharing Industry," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(6), pages 1303-1328, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:46:y:2025:i:2:p:448-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.