IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v45y2024i1p279-297.html

Trade unions, stigma and legitimacy: A case study about academic wages in British universities

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Black

Abstract

This article applies the concept of legitimacy to reinterpret collective bargaining as a war of words instead of an institutional arrangement of negotiations and power struggles between employers and trade unions. The case study investigates trade union discourse by collecting and analysing campaign materials about academic wages across British universities over 18 years. The results suggest trade unions tried to stigmatize British universities for not engaging in consultation and negotiation; acting with honesty and good faith; or being transparent and equitable. However, none of these management practices puts economic framing at the forefront, which is at odds with financialization and the essence of wages being about money and performance. This article concludes that embracing economics and reducing plurality within trade union discourse may help legitimize academic wages to match economic growth in the sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Black, 2024. "Trade unions, stigma and legitimacy: A case study about academic wages in British universities," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(1), pages 279-297, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:45:y:2024:i:1:p:279-297
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X231154757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X231154757
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X231154757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blake E. Ashforth & Barrie W. Gibbs, 1990. "The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 177-194, May.
    2. Riccardo Pariboni & Pasquale Tridico, 2019. "Labour share decline, financialisation and structural change," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(4), pages 1073-1102.
    3. Jill Rubery, 1997. "Wages and the Labour Market," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 337-366, September.
    4. Barry T. Hirsch & Edward J. Schumacher, 2001. "Private Sector Union Density and the Wage Premium: Past, Present, and Future ," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 22(3), pages 487-518, July.
    5. Philippe Monin & Eero Vaara, 2010. "A Recursive Perspective on Discursive Legitimation and Organizational Action in Mergers and Acquisitions," Post-Print hal-02312439, HAL.
    6. Eero Vaara & Jeanne Tienari, 2008. "A Discursive Perspective on Legitimation Strategies in Multinational Corporations," Post-Print hal-02276724, HAL.
    7. Erling Barth & Alex Bryson & Harald Dale-Olsen, 2020. "Union Density Effects on Productivity and Wages," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(631), pages 1898-1936.
    8. Lubomira Radoilska, 2008. "Truthfulness and Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 21-28, April.
    9. Eero Vaara & Philippe Monin, 2010. "A Recursive Perspective on Discursive Legitimation and Organizational Action in Mergers and Acquisitions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 3-22, February.
    10. Joep P. Cornelissen & Rodolphe Durand & Peer Fiss & John C. Lammers & Eero Vaara, 2015. "Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis," Post-Print hal-02313194, HAL.
    11. Barry T. Hirsch, 2004. "What Do Unions Do for Economic Performance?," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 25(3), pages 415-456, July.
    12. Bernd Fitzenberger & Karsten Kohn & Alexander C. Lembcke, 2013. "Union Density and Varieties of Coverage: The Anatomy of Union Wage Effects in Germany," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 66(1), pages 169-197, January.
    13. Cornelissen, J. P. & Durand, Rodolphe & Fiss, Peer C. & Lammers, John & Vaara, Eero, 2015. "Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis," HEC Research Papers Series 1168, HEC Paris.
    14. Anna Lamin & Srilata Zaheer, 2012. "Wall Street vs. Main Street: Firm Strategies for Defending Legitimacy and Their Impact on Different Stakeholders," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 47-66, February.
    15. Edward P. Lazear, 2000. "Economic Imperialism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(1), pages 99-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominik Rueede & Karin Kreutzer, 2015. "Legitimation Work Within a Cross-Sector Social Partnership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 39-58, April.
    2. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    3. Maria Joutsenvirta, 2013. "Executive Pay and Legitimacy: Changing Discursive Battles Over the Morality of Excessive Manager Compensation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 459-477, September.
    4. Norbert Steigenberger & Hendrik Wilhelm, 2018. "Extending Signaling Theory to Rhetorical Signals: Evidence from Crowdfunding," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 529-546, June.
    5. Sonia S. Siraz & Björn Claes & Julio O. De Castro & Eero Vaara, 2023. "Theorizing the Grey Area between Legitimacy and Illegitimacy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 924-962, June.
    6. Hossfeld, Heiko, 2018. "Legitimation and institutionalization of managerial practices. The role of organizational rhetoric," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 9-21.
    7. Xinran Wang & Jiaju Yan & Timothy P. Munyon & T. Russell Crook, 2025. "Breached But Not Broken: How Attributional Information Shapes Shareholder Reactions to Firms Following Data Breaches," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 71-92, February.
    8. Alex Bitektine & Patrick Haack & Joel Bothello & Johanna Mair, 2020. "Inhabited Actors: Internalizing Institutions through Communication and Actorhood Models," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 885-897, June.
    9. Leif W. Lundmark & Chong Oh & J. Cameron Verhaal, 0. "A little Birdie told me: Social media, organizational legitimacy, and underpricing in initial public offerings," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    10. Charles Cho & Martin Martens & Hakkyun Kim & Michelle Rodrigue, 2011. "Astroturfing Global Warming: It Isn’t Always Greener on the Other Side of the Fence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(4), pages 571-587, December.
    11. Renate E. Meyer & Eero Vaara, 2020. "Institutions and Actorhood as Co‐Constitutive and Co‐Constructed: The Argument and Areas for Future Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 898-910, June.
    12. Changgui Peng & Shubo Liu & Yuan Lu, 2021. "The discursive strategy of legitimacy management: A comparative case study of Google and Apple’s crisis communication statements," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 519-545, June.
    13. Tian, Xiaocong, 2022. "The art of rhetoric: Host country political hostility and the rhetorical strategies of foreign subsidiaries in developing economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    14. Gebert Persson, Sabine & Lundberg, Heléne & Elbe, Jörgen, 2014. "On the discursive contest of an international M&A relationship development process within financial services," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1064-1073.
    15. König, Andreas & Fehn, Angela & Puck, Jonas & Graf-Vlachy, Lorenz, 2017. "Primary or complex? Towards a theory of metaphorical strategy communication in MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 270-285.
    16. Joep P. Cornelissen & Rodolphe Durand & Peer Fiss & John C. Lammers & Eero Vaara, 2015. "Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis," Post-Print hal-02276731, HAL.
    17. Zheng, Qiuxia & Noorderhaven, Niels & Du, Jian, 2022. "Making the unlikely marriage work: The integration process of Chinese strategic asset-seeking acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(3).
    18. Lehmann, Julian & Weber, Florian & Waldkirch, Matthias & Graf-Vlachy, Lorenz & König, Andreas, 2022. "Institutional work battles in the sharing economy: Unveiling actors and discursive strategies in media discourse," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Tukiainen, Sampo, 2015. "Sensemaking of managing cultural differences in a Finnish-Polish project," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 69-83.
    20. Leif W. Lundmark & Chong Oh & J. Cameron Verhaal, 2017. "A little Birdie told me: Social media, organizational legitimacy, and underpricing in initial public offerings," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1407-1422, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:45:y:2024:i:1:p:279-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.