IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v42y2021i1p142-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Always looking for something better? The impact of job insecurity on turnover intentions: Do employables and irreplaceables react differently?

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Balz

    (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany)

  • Karin Schuller

    (Max-Planck-Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Germany)

Abstract

This study contributes to the current research on the effect of job insecurity on turnover intentions by examining what happens to employees when job security is replaced with employment security. It analyzes whether perceived employability and irreplaceability (a) increase or decrease turnover intentions, or (b) buffer or intensify the negative effects of job insecurity on turnover intentions. The study focuses on an international context by using International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) data to assess the generalizability of the results. The findings show that perceived job insecurity increases turnover intentions in all countries. In addition, perceived employability increases turnover intentions in most countries, whereas weak evidence suggests that employees who feel irreplaceable are less likely to have turnover intentions. The results on the question about whether employees who feel employable or irreplaceable react differently to job insecurity – with respect to turnover intentions – vary widely between countries, and so a general conclusion about buffering effects cannot be drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Balz & Karin Schuller, 2021. "Always looking for something better? The impact of job insecurity on turnover intentions: Do employables and irreplaceables react differently?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(1), pages 142-159, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:42:y:2021:i:1:p:142-159
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X18757058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X18757058
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X18757058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:42:y:2021:i:1:p:142-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.