IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v32y2011i2p181-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When flexibility diversity becomes socially acceptable: The case of the French hospital industry

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Mossé

    (Institute of Labour Economics and Industrial Sociology (LEST), CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, France, philippe.mosse@univmed.fr)

  • Philippe Méhaut

    (Institute of Labour Economics and Industrial Sociology (LEST), CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, France)

  • Anne-Marie Arborio

    (Institute of Labour Economics and Industrial Sociology (LEST), CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, France)

  • Lise Causse

    (Centre d'études et de recherches sur les qualifications (CEREQ), France)

Abstract

The aim of this article, which is mostly based on case studies of public and private French hospitals, is to analyse the employment of nurse assistants (NA) and unqualified health care workers ( agent des services hospitaliers or ASH), focusing particularly on questions of flexibility. First, the article shows that in French hospitals, the cleaning and basic health care tasks are performed by a relatively stable core group of employees and by a more flexible workforce. From the hospital perspective, the need for flexibility is related to the growing trend towards rationalization. But employees see the demands for flexibility from a different angle, depending on their professional histories. The article also shows that the nurse assistants and unqualified health care workers who work under these unstable conditions may see this situation as a transition period and as a gateway to permanent jobs. Consequently, and despite the difficult working conditions, the job opportunities offered by hospitals may be attractive to women with few or no qualifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Mossé & Philippe Méhaut & Anne-Marie Arborio & Lise Causse, 2011. "When flexibility diversity becomes socially acceptable: The case of the French hospital industry," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 32(2), pages 181-197, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:32:y:2011:i:2:p:181-197
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X10373284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X10373284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X10373284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:32:y:2011:i:2:p:181-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.