IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v31y2010i1p62-92.html

The Lived Experience of Isolation for Vulnerable Workers Facing Workplace Grievances in 21st-Century Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Pollert

    (University of the West of England)

Abstract

In the ‘Warwick Agreement’ with trade union leaders in 2004, the British government pledged support for ‘vulnerable workers’ and developed this policy in 2006. However, there is no policy acknowledgement that weak collective organization is the cause of worker vulnerability. This article is based on a definition of vulnerability as non-unionism and low pay and presents findings based on in-depth interviews with low-paid, non-unionized workers with employment grievances who approached the major British charity providing free advice, the Citizens Advice Bureau. This is framed in a contemporaneous survey of 500 low-paid, non-unionized workers with problems at work, which provides data on the kinds of problems experienced, responses to them and the pattern of outcomes for such workers. The study found a very low level of successful resolution. The significance of the qualitative evidence is that it illuminates the lived experience of isolation and poor resolution among workers seeking external help.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Pollert, 2010. "The Lived Experience of Isolation for Vulnerable Workers Facing Workplace Grievances in 21st-Century Britain," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(1), pages 62-92, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:31:y:2010:i:1:p:62-92
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X09343992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X09343992
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X09343992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Smith & Gary Morton, 2001. "New Labour’s Reform of Britain’s Employment Law: The Devil is not only in the Detail but in the Values and Policy Too," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 119-138, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miguel Martinez Lucio & Mark Stuart, 2005. "‘Partnership’ and new industrial relations in a risk society," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 19(4), pages 797-817, December.
    2. Alex Bryson & Erling Barth & Harald Dale-Olsen, 2013. "The Effects of Organizational Change on Worker Well-Being and the Moderating Role of Trade Unions," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 66(4), pages 989-1011, July.
    3. Bengt Furåker & Mattias Bengtsson, 2013. "Collective and individual benefits of trade unions: a multi-level analysis of 21 European countries," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5-6), pages 548-565, November.
    4. Jeremy Waddington, 2013. "The Views of Members towards Workplace Union Organization in Banking between 1999 and 2008," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 51(2), pages 333-354, June.
    5. Anna Pollert & Andy Charlwood, 2009. "The vulnerable worker in Britain and problems at work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 343-362, June.
    6. John Godard, 2007. "Unions, Work Practices, and Wages under Different Institutional Environments: The Case of Canada and England," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 60(4), pages 457-476, July.
    7. Peter Waring & Shane Ostenfeld & John Lewer & John Burgess, 2001. "The Third Way, Employment and the Workplace in Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 12(2), pages 174-192, December.
    8. John Godard, 2003. "Labour Unions, Workplace Rights and Canadian Public Policy," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 29(4), pages 449-467, December.
    9. Chris Forde & Gary Slater, 2005. "Agency Working in Britain: Character, Consequences and Regulation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(2), pages 249-271, June.
    10. Zagelmeyer, Stefan, 2003. "Die Entwicklung kollektiver Verhandlungen in Großbritannien: ein historischer Überblick," Discussion Papers 17, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics.
    11. Robert Perrett, 2007. "Worker voice in the context of the re-regulation of employment: employer tactics and statutory union recognition in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 21(4), pages 617-634, December.
    12. Alexander C. Lembcke, 2014. "The Impact of Mandatory Entitlement to Paid Leave on Employment in the UK," CEP Discussion Papers dp1262, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    13. Nicolo Rosetti, 2019. "Do European trade unions foster social solidarity? Evidence from multilevel data in 18 countries," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 84-101, January.
    14. John Godard, 2009. "Institutional Environments, Work and Human Resource Practices, and Unions: Canada versus England," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 62(2), pages 173-199, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:31:y:2010:i:1:p:62-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.