IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v27y2006i4p543-564.html

Profit Sharing and Employee Share Ownership in Ireland: A New Departure?

Author

Listed:
  • Daryl D’Art

    (University of Limerick)

  • Thomas Turner

    (University of Limerick)

Abstract

Recently, it has been argued that contemporary conditions facilitating the growth of profit sharing and employee share ownership schemes represent a fundamental break with the past. The contemporary combination of government, employer and union support for profit sharing schemes amounts, it has been suggested, to a series of ‘favourable conjunctures’. These conjunctures are viewed as constituting a break with the previous cyclical pattern. Given Irish government, employer and trade union support for profit sharing, Ireland appears as an excellent exemplar of ‘favourable conjunctures’. Using the Irish example, the authors test a number of hypotheses including the favourable conjunctures thesis to explain the trend in profit sharing schemes. Although there was a dramatic increase in the adoption of profit sharing/employee shareholding schemes during the 1990s, this subsequently declined. The Irish case suggests that the cyclical and contingent nature of profit sharing appears likely to persist.

Suggested Citation

  • Daryl D’Art & Thomas Turner, 2006. "Profit Sharing and Employee Share Ownership in Ireland: A New Departure?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 27(4), pages 543-564, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:27:y:2006:i:4:p:543-564
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X06068990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X06068990
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X06068990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas L. Kruse, 1996. "Why Do Firms Adopt Profit-Sharing and Employee Ownership Plans?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 34(4), pages 515-538, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon S Torp, 2016. "The prevalence and antecedents of employee stock ownership in Denmark," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(1), pages 119-144, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Derek Jones & Panu Kalmi & Niels Mygind, 2005. "Choice of Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Estonia," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 83-107.
    2. Kim, Kyoung Yong & Patel, Pankaj C. & Devaraj, Srikant, 2025. "Sorting, incentive, and investment effects of employee stock ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Leila Baghdadi & Rihab Bellakhal & Marc-Arthur Diaye, 2016. "Financial Participation: Does the Risk Transfer Story Hold in France?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 3-29, March.
    4. Bol, Jasmijn C. & Moers, Frank, 2010. "The dynamics of incentive contracting: The role of learning in the diffusion process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 721-736, November.
    5. John S. Heywood & Uwe Jirjahn, 2014. "Variable Pay, Industrial Relations and Foreign Ownership: Evidence from Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 521-552, September.
    6. Kyoung Yong Kim & Pankaj C. Patel, 2021. "A Multilevel Contingency Model of Employee Ownership and Firm Productivity: The Moderating Roles of Industry Growth and Instability," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 625-648, May.
    7. Harbaugh, Rick, 2005. "The effect of employee stock ownership on wage and employment bargaining," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 565-583, September.
    8. Uwe Jirjahn & Jens Mohrenweiser, 2025. "Variable Payment Schemes and Productivity: Do Individual‐Based Schemes Really Have a Stronger Influence Than Collective Ones?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(4), pages 1316-1332, November.
    9. Djaoudath Alidou, 2011. "Les augmentations de capital réservées aux salariés en France - Employee Equity Issue:Evidence from France," Working Papers CREGO 1110603, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    10. Frank Scharr, 2005. "Tarifbindung, Rententeilung und Konzessionsverträge als Einflussgrößen der Lohnhöhe in Unternehmen : eine Untersuchung mit Mikrodaten für thüringische Firmen," ifo Dresden Studien, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 39, February.
    11. Barbara Bechter & Nils Braakmann & Bernd Brandl, 2021. "Variable Pay Systems and/or Collective Wage Bargaining? Complements or Substitutes?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(2), pages 443-469, March.
    12. Thomas Cornelissen & John S. Heywood & Uwe Jirjahn, 2010. "Profit Sharing and Reciprocity: Theory and Survey Evidence," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 292, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    13. Shan Li & Kay-Yut Chen & Ying Rong, 2020. "The Behavioral Promise and Pitfalls in Compensating Store Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4899-4919, October.
    14. Chaudhry, Neeru & Kattamuri, Rohit, 2024. "Do defined contribution plans create value for shareholders?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 616-633.
    15. Richard J. Long & Tony Fang, 2012. "Do Employees Profit from Profit Sharing? Evidence from Canadian Panel Data," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 65(4), pages 899-927, October.
    16. Panu Kalmi, 2006. "Stock option compensation and equity values," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 10(2), pages 1-8.
    17. Park, Heejin & Noh, Jung-Hee & Pedersen, Melissa & Lee, Sora, 2022. "What are the determinants and managerial motivations for employee ownership in retirement pension plans?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    18. Matthias Schmitt, 2003. "Deregulation of the German Industrial Relations System via Foreign Direct Investment: Are the Subsidiaries of Anglo-Saxon MNCs a Threat for the Institutions of Industrial Democracy in Germany?," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 24(3), pages 349-377, August.
    19. Erika E. Harden & Douglas L. Kruse & Joseph R. Blasi, 2010. "Who Has a Better Idea? Innovation, Shared Capitalism, and Human Resources Policies," NBER Chapters, in: Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-based Stock Options, pages 225-253, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel & Ken Starkey, 2019. "Captains Of Industry? Value Allocation And The Partnering Effect Of Managerial Discretion," Post-Print hal-02281514, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:27:y:2006:i:4:p:543-564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.