IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/compsc/v32y2015i4p356-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tilting at a windmill? The conceptual problem in contemporary peace science

Author

Listed:
  • Will H. Moore

Abstract

Peace scientists such as Kenneth Boulding, Ted Gurr, Thomas Schelling, and Charles Tilly were fastidious in their use of abstract concepts free of the political baggage that politicians, policymakers, and pundits necessarily foist upon the terms in the rough and tumble world of politics. Too much contemporary peace science fails to follow their lead. This essay describes this problem and proposes a useful heuristic to help us improve.

Suggested Citation

  • Will H. Moore, 2015. "Tilting at a windmill? The conceptual problem in contemporary peace science," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 32(4), pages 356-369, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:32:y:2015:i:4:p:356-369
    DOI: 10.1177/0738894215593721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0738894215593721
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0738894215593721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Schmid, 2004. "Frameworks For Conceptualising Terrorism," Terrorism and Political Violence, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 197-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Johnston & Srinjoy Bose, 2020. "Violence, Power and Meaning: The Moral Logic of Terrorism," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(3), pages 315-325, May.
    2. Friedrich Schneider & Raul Caruso, 2011. "The (Hidden) Financial Flows of Terrorist and Transnational Crime Organizations: A Literature Review and Some Preliminary Empirical Results," Economics of Security Working Paper Series 52, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Sarah L. Carthy & Colm B. Doody & Katie Cox & Denis O'Hora & Kiran M. Sarma, 2020. "Counter‐narratives for the prevention of violent radicalisation: A systematic review of targeted interventions," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), September.
    4. Edoardo Magnone, 2014. "The extreme case of terrorism: a scientometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 179-201, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:compsc:v:32:y:2015:i:4:p:356-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://pss.la.psu.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.