IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v31y2022i6p1023-1032.html

Expectations of an Online-Self-Management Program for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Author

Listed:
  • Su-Hui Chen
  • Kuang-Hui Yu
  • Yi-Hui Lee
  • Jung-Hua Shao

Abstract

This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore expectations of patients and healthcare experts for an online self-management program for rheumatoid arthritis. Participants were recruited from rheumatology clinics, medical centers, and universities in Taiwan. Individual face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients ( n  = 16) and healthcare experts ( n  = 7). Content analysis of the interview data resulted in five subthemes for expectations of an online self-management program: information about how the disease trajectory would impact future health status, availability of opportunities for self-monitoring, opportunities to interact with fellow patients and healthcare providers, simplicity and ease-of-use of the program, and methods to facilitate patient-motivation. These subthemes formulated two overarching themes: content and format. An online self-management program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis should provide evidence-based information about disease variables and behaviors aligned with the specific needs of the individual and adopt strategies that encourage and increase motivation and confidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Su-Hui Chen & Kuang-Hui Yu & Yi-Hui Lee & Jung-Hua Shao, 2022. "Expectations of an Online-Self-Management Program for Rheumatoid Arthritis," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(6), pages 1023-1032, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:6:p:1023-1032
    DOI: 10.1177/10547738211041692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10547738211041692
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10547738211041692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karin Schölin Bywall & Jorien Veldwijk & Mats G. Hansson & Ulrik Kihlbom, 2019. "Patient Perspectives on the Value of Patient Preference Information in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study in Swedish Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 12(3), pages 297-305, June.
    2. Arja Rantala & Minna Pikkarainen & Tarja Pölkki, 2020. "Health specialists’ views on the needs for developing a digital gaming solution for paediatric day surgery: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3541-3552, September.
    3. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303999_5 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Su‐Hui Chen & Jung‐hua Shao, 2012. "‘Have you had your bowl of rice?’: a qualitative study of eating patterns in older Taiwanese adults," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1‐2), pages 2-10, January.
    5. Cohen, A.C. & Zimmerman, F. & Prelip, M. & Glik, D., 2017. "A smartphone application to reduce time-to-notification of sexually transmitted infections," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(11), pages 1795-1800.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melanie J. Cozad & Lisa C. Lindley & Kaitlyn Crosby & Noor Alshareef & Ann Blair Kennedy & Gulzar Merchant & Pam Evans & Ronnie D. Horner, 2023. "Patient Goals for Living with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Qualitative Study," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 32(1), pages 40-48, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:31:y:2022:i:6:p:1023-1032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.