Author
Listed:
- Marianne Clausen
- Amanda Le Couteur
(School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia)
- Shona Crabb
(School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia)
- Anna Chur-Hansen
(School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia)
- Niki Vincent
(Commission for Gender Equality in the Public Sector, Melbourne, VIC, Australia)
Abstract
How do organisational leaders attend to gender in discussions of men’s flexible work and what are the implications for men’s flexible work? Twelve organisational leaders were interviewed to understand organisational factors that may affect men’s access to and use of flexible work. Workplace gender inequality is related to uneven gendered divisions of work and care. Flexible work has the potential to allow for more equal sharing of care, but it is underused by men. Participants displayed an unexpected pattern during interviews – they avoided talking about men. Inductive qualitative analysis was undertaken, using thematic discourse analysis. Two broad themes were developed from the data, with participants avoiding talking about men, or discussing men and women with regard to traditional gender roles. The themes were found to conform to the theory of gender-blind sexism. Furthermore, we propose an extension of the theory due to a novel finding of gender being maximised. Gender-blind sexism contributes to current understandings of gender inequality, particularly in situations purporting to be gender-neutral, such as modern organisations. We suggest that leaders consider adopting gender sensitive language in order to acknowledge gender, address gender inequality, and facilitate men’s flexible work. JEL Classification: J16, J22
Suggested Citation
Marianne Clausen & Amanda Le Couteur & Shona Crabb & Anna Chur-Hansen & Niki Vincent, 2026.
"‘This is not necessarily a gender thing’: Gender-blind talk of organisational leaders,"
Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 51(3), pages 984-1004, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:ausman:v:51:y:2026:i:3:p:984-1004
DOI: 10.1177/03128962251355310
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
- J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:51:y:2026:i:3:p:984-1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.