IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v48y2023i2p262-283.html

Sustainable sourcing and agility performance: The moderating effects of organizational ambidexterity and supply chain disruption

Author

Listed:
  • Lingjia Li

    (School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China)

  • Shuo Shan

    (School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Department of Marketing, College of Business, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong)

  • Yongyi Shou
  • Mingu Kang

    (School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China)

  • Young Won Park

    (Faculty of Economics, Saitama University, Saitama, Japan; Manufacturing Management Research Center, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan)

Abstract

Sustainable sourcing is an important sustainability practice yet its impact on the firm’s agility performance remains unexamined. Combining the extended resource-based view and contingency theory, this study hypothesizes that sustainable sourcing improves agility performance and this effect is enhanced by organizational ambidexterity and supply chain disruption. Using a sample of 790 manufacturing firms, the regression results show the positive performance effect of sustainable sourcing and the moderating roles of both combined ambidextrous orientation and supply chain disruption. This study makes contributions to the relevant literature on sustainable supply chain management, organizational ambidexterity and agility, and offers insightful managerial implications. JEL Classification: M10, M14

Suggested Citation

  • Lingjia Li & Shuo Shan & Yongyi Shou & Mingu Kang & Young Won Park, 2023. "Sustainable sourcing and agility performance: The moderating effects of organizational ambidexterity and supply chain disruption," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(2), pages 262-283, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:48:y:2023:i:2:p:262-283
    DOI: 10.1177/03128962211071128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03128962211071128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/03128962211071128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atanu Chaudhuri & Jayanth Jayaram, 2019. "A socio-technical view of performance impact of integrated quality and sustainability strategies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 1478-1496, March.
    2. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    3. Justin J.P. Jansen & Zeki Simsek & Qing Cao, 2012. "Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(11), pages 1286-1303, November.
    4. Mark Loon & Xiaohong Iris Quan, 2021. "Theorising business model innovation: An integrated literature review," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(3), pages 548-577, August.
    5. Zi-Lin He & Poh-Kam Wong, 2004. "Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 481-494, August.
    6. Cristina Gimenez & Vicenta Sierra, 2013. "Sustainable Supply Chains: Governance Mechanisms to Greening Suppliers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 189-203, August.
    7. O'Reilly, Charles A., III & Tushman, Michael L., 2013. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future," Research Papers 2130, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    8. Gillani, Fatima & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: Antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Feryal Erhun & Tim Kraft & Sytske Wijnsma, 2021. "Sustainable Triple‐A Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 644-655, March.
    10. Lin, Liang-Hung & Ho, Yu-Ling, 2021. "Ambidextrous governance and alliance performance under dynamic environments: An empirical investigation of Taiwanese technology alliances," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Ghiyoung Im & Arun Rai, 2008. "Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(7), pages 1281-1296, July.
    12. Jose Benitez & Ana Castillo & Javier Llorens & Jessica Braojos, 2018. "IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small U.S. firms: The moderator role of social media capability," Post-Print hal-01998044, HAL.
    13. Prince, J. & Kay, J. M., 2003. "Combining lean and agile characteristics: Creation of virtual groups by enhanced production flow analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 305-318, September.
    14. Sea-Jin Chang & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Lorraine Eden, 2010. "From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 178-184, February.
    15. Kim, Minkyun & Chai, Sangmi, 2017. "The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 42-52.
    16. Lee, Nick & Cadogan, John W., 2013. "Problems with formative and higher-order reflective variables," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 242-247.
    17. Munir, Manal & Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    18. Stephanie A. Fernhaber & Pankaj C. Patel, 2012. "How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity? The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(13), pages 1516-1539, December.
    19. Qing Cao & Eric Gedajlovic & Hongping Zhang, 2009. "Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 781-796, August.
    20. Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2018. "Impact of supply chain risk on agility performance: Mediating role of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 118-138.
    21. Frank T. Rothaermel & Maria Tereza Alexandre, 2009. "Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 759-780, August.
    22. Shekarian, Mansoor & Reza Nooraie, Seyed Vahid & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2020. "An examination of the impact of flexibility and agility on mitigating supply chain disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    23. Glenn Kit Foong Ho & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Marvin Wee & Chaiyuth Padungsaksawasdi, 2022. "The effect of short selling on volatility and jumps," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(1), pages 34-52, February.
    24. Cristina Sancha & Frank Wiengarten & Annachiara Longoni & Mark Pagell, 2020. "The moderating role of temporary work on the performance of lean manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(14), pages 4285-4305, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shefali Srivastava & Vernika Agarwal & Ashish Dwivedi & Anchal Patil & Surajit Bag & Cyril R. H. Foropon, 2025. "Contributing Factors for Building a Flexible Supply Chain in the Digital Age: Studying Their Impact on SDGs," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(1), pages 141-161, March.
    2. Al-kahtib, Ayman & Alghababsheh, Mohammad & Khattab, Mais, 2025. "The role of organizational ambidexterity and frugal innovation in enhancing circular supply chains: The effect of artificial intelligence capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Muhammad Khalilur Rahman & Md Arafat Hossain & Arsalan Zahid Piprani & Ahmad Ridhuwan Abdullah, 2025. "Impact of tech-driven integration, flexibility, and ambidexterity on supply chain integration and performance in manufacturing firms: moderating role of uncertainty and agility," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Pranav Sanjay Sutar & Gaurav Chandrakant Kolte & S. Yamini, 2026. "Food supply chain disruptions and its resilience: a framework and review for resilience strategies in the digital era," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 63(1), pages 164-198, March.
    5. Yunting Feng & Xiaoping Zhao & Qinghua Zhu, 2023. "Sustainable supply chains in a turbulent world: Challenges and opportunities," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(2), pages 199-203, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Partanen, Jukka & Kohtamäki, Marko & Patel, Pankaj C. & Parida, Vinit, 2020. "Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Solís-Molina, Miguel & Hernández-Espallardo, Miguel & Rodríguez-Orejuela, Augusto, 2018. "Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 181-194.
    3. Katou, Anastasia A. & Budhwar, Pawan S. & Patel, Charmi, 2021. "A trilogy of organizational ambidexterity: Leader’s social intelligence, employee work engagement and environmental changes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 688-700.
    4. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio, 2020. "Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 363-372.
    5. Guo, Jingjing & Guo, Bin & Zhou, Jianghua & Wu, Xiaobo, 2020. "How does the ambidexterity of technological learning routine affect firm innovation performance within industrial clusters? The moderating effects of knowledge attributes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Iftikhar, Anas & Ali, Imran & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Stevenson, Mark & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2025. "Firms’ strategic responses to rising uncertainty amid ongoing geopolitical tensions: The synergistic mediating role of network capability and innovation ambidexterity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Juan A. Martínez-Román & Javier Gamero & Juan A. Tamayo & María de Loreto Delgado-González, 2025. "Empirical analysis of the technological exploration–exploitation balance and its impact on organizational performance under uncertainty," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Naomi Haefner & Maximilian Palmié & Petteri T. Leppänen, 2023. "With(Out) a Little Help From My Friends? Reconciling Incongruous Findings on Stakeholder Management, Innovation, and Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(1), pages 142-171, January.
    9. Balasubramaniam Ramesh & Kannan Mohan & Lan Cao, 2012. "Ambidexterity in Agile Distributed Development: An Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 323-339, June.
    10. Vinit Parida & Tom Lahti & Joakim Wincent, 2016. "Exploration and exploitation and firm performance variability: a study of ambidexterity in entrepreneurial firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1147-1164, December.
    11. David B. Audretsch & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "Is ambidexterity the missing link between entrepreneurship, management, and innovation?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1891-1918, December.
    12. Koryak, Oksana & Lockett, Andy & Hayton, James & Nicolaou, Nicos & Mole, Kevin, 2018. "Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 413-427.
    13. Gedajlovic, Eric & Cao, Qing & Zhang, Hongping, 2012. "Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: Evidence from a transitional economy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 652-665.
    14. Liu Li, 2020. "Trade-Off Exploration and Exploitation as Moderators: How does Technological Heterogeneity among Cooperators Affect Firms Financial Performance?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(4), pages 380-398, April.
    15. Cabeza-Pullés, Dainelis & Fernández-Pérez, Virginia & Roldán-Bravo, María Isabel, 2020. "Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 450-461.
    16. Liu, Yi & Liao, Yonghai & Li, Yuan, 2018. "Capability configuration, ambidexterity and performance: Evidence from service outsourcing sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 343-352.
    17. Bedford, David S. & Bisbe, Josep & Sweeney, Breda, 2019. "Performance measurement systems as generators of cognitive conflict in ambidextrous firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 21-37.
    18. Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Ku-Ho Lin, 2019. "Impact of Ambidexterity and Environmental Dynamism on Dynamic Capability Development Trade-Offs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Christine Chou & Steven O. Kimbrough, 2016. "An agent-based model of organizational ambidexterity decisions and strategies in new product development," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 4-46, March.
    20. Wenke, Kathrin & Zapkau, Florian B. & Schwens, Christian, 2021. "Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 653-665.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:48:y:2023:i:2:p:262-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.