IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v692y2020i1p68-96.html

The Evolution of Federal Child Welfare Policy through the Family First Prevention Services Act of 2018: Opportunities, Barriers, and Unintended Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Mark F. Testa
  • David Kelly

Abstract

The Family First Prevention Services Act of 2018 affords child welfare agencies a new opportunity to fund evidence-supported interventions to prevent children’s removal into public foster care and ensure that youth in care receive appropriate treatment in the least restrictive (most family-like) setting. The new law has been generally heralded as a much-needed improvement over prior funding constraints, but there are concerns among a growing number of child welfare leaders, researchers, professional membership organizations, and advocacy groups that its focus on the families of children who are at immanent risk of removal because of maltreatment is too limiting and that overreliance on strict evidence standards may contribute to racial disparity. This article considers how child welfare agencies can best leverage the opportunities presented by Family First while addressing potential barriers posed by the paucity of evidence-supported prevention programs and avoiding the unintended consequences of limiting reimbursement to only selective prevention services that meet rigorous evidence standards of effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark F. Testa & David Kelly, 2020. "The Evolution of Federal Child Welfare Policy through the Family First Prevention Services Act of 2018: Opportunities, Barriers, and Unintended Consequences," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 692(1), pages 68-96, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:692:y:2020:i:1:p:68-96
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716220976528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716220976528
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716220976528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron Haskins, 2020. "Child Welfare Financing: What Do We Fund, How, and What Could Be Improved?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 692(1), pages 50-67, November.
    2. Testa, Mark F., 2009. "How the bear evolved into a whale: A rejoinder to Leroy Pelton's note contesting Mark Testa's version of national foster care population trends," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 491-494, April.
    3. Testa, Mark F., 1992. "Conditions of risk for substitute care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 14(1-2), pages 27-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan Feely & Kerri M. Raissian & William Schneider & Lindsey Rose Bullinger, 2020. "The Social Welfare Policy Landscape and Child Protective Services: Opportunities for and Barriers to Creating Systems Synergy," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 692(1), pages 140-161, November.
    2. Shook, Kristen, 1999. "Does the loss of welfare income increase the risk of involvement with the child welfare system?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(9-10), pages 781-814.
    3. Rittner, Barbara & Wodarski, John S., 1999. "Differential uses for BSW and MSW educated social workers in child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 217-238, March.
    4. Pelton, Leroy H., 2009. "A reply to Mark Testa's rejoinder concerning national foster care population trends," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 697-698, June.
    5. Fred Wulczyn, 2020. "Foster Care in a Life Course Perspective," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 692(1), pages 227-252, November.
    6. Sanchirico, Andrew & Lau, W. Josephine & Jablonka, Kary & Russell, Stephen J., 1998. "Foster parent involvement in service planning: Does it increase job satisfaction?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 325-346, May.
    7. Beeman, Sandra K. & Kim, Hyungmo & Bullerdick, Susan K., 2000. "Factors affecting placement of children in kinship and nonkinship foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 37-54, January.
    8. Park, Jung Min & Helton, Jesse, 2010. "Transitioning from informal to formal substitute care following maltreatment investigation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 998-1003, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:692:y:2020:i:1:p:68-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.