IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v687y2020i1p8-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence-Based Policing and Fatal Police Shootings: Promise, Problems, and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence W. Sherman

Abstract

The promise of evidence-based policing is to reduce harm with better research for targeting, testing, and tracking police actions. The problems of using evidence-based policing to reduce harm are found in the emotional dimensions of ethics and risk. These problems are most pronounced with fatal police shootings, where the risks of injury to American police are often framed as a zero-sum choice in relation to the ethics of taking citizens’ lives. Yet evidence-based policing offers good prospects for reframing the debate over fatal police shootings, in ways that could reduce harm to both police and citizens. This volume offers substantial new evidence for initiatives at all levels of U.S. government that could help to save lives in police encounters with citizens. Putting that evidence to work remains the major challenge facing the American police.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence W. Sherman, 2020. "Evidence-Based Policing and Fatal Police Shootings: Promise, Problems, and Prospects," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 687(1), pages 8-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:687:y:2020:i:1:p:8-26
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716220902073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716220902073
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716220902073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:687:y:2020:i:1:p:8-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.