IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v663y2016i1p331-354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Death “The Great Equalizer†? The Social Stratification of Death Quality in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Carr

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) gradients in mortality risk are well documented, although less is known about whether the quality of older adults’ dying experiences is stratified by SES. I focus on six core components of a “good death†: pain and symptom management, acceptance, medical care that is concordant with one’s preferences, dying at home, emotional preparation, and formal preparations for end-of-life care. Analyses are based on four data sets spanning the 1980s through 2010s, a period marked by rising economic inequalities: Changing Lives of Older Couples (1986–1994), Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (1993–2010), New Jersey End of Life study (2005–2007), and Wisconsin Study of Families and Loss (2010–2014). I find evidence of SES disparities in two outcomes only: pain and advance care planning (ACP), widely considered an important step toward a “good death.†Implications for health care policy and practice, against the backdrop of the Affordable Care Act implementation, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Carr, 2016. "Is Death “The Great Equalizer†? The Social Stratification of Death Quality in the United States," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 663(1), pages 331-354, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:663:y:2016:i:1:p:331-354
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716215596982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716215596982
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716215596982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Carr & Dmitry Khodyakov, 2007. "End-of-Life Health Care Planning Among Young-Old Adults: An Assessment of Psychosocial Influences," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(2), pages 135-141.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angela Woosley & Sharon M. Danes & Marlene Stum, 2017. "Utilizing a Family Decision-Making Lens to Examine Adults’ End-of-Life Planning Actions," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 33-44, March.
    2. Claire Preston & Nick Drydakis & Suzanna Forwood & Suzanne Hughes & Catherine Meads, 2019. "What Are the Structural Barriers to Planning for Later Life? A Scoping Review of the Literature," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 17-26.
    3. Carr, Deborah & Kalousova, Lucie & Lin, Katherine & Burgard, Sarah, 2021. "Occupational differences in advance care planning: Are medical professionals more likely to plan?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    4. Yung-Ting Su, 2008. "Looking Beyond Retirement: Patterns and Predictors of Formal End-of-Life Planning Among Retirement Age Individuals," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 654-673, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:663:y:2016:i:1:p:331-354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.