IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v589y2003i1p22-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Iain Chalmers

Abstract

Because professionals sometimes do more harm than good when they intervene in the lives of other people, their policies and practices should be informed by rigorous, transparent, up-to-date evaluations. Surveys often reveal wide variations in the type and frequency of practice and policy interventions, and this evidence of collective uncertainty should prompt the humility that is a precondition for rigorous evaluation. Evaluation should begin with systematic assessment of as high a proportion as possible of existing relevant, reliable research, and then, if appropriate, additional research. Systematic, up-to-date reviews of research—such as those that the Cochrane and Campbell Collaborations endeavor to prepare and maintain—are designed to minimize the likelihood that the effects of interventions will be confused with the effects of biases and chance. Policy makers and practitioners can choose whether, and if so how, they wish their policies and practices to be informed by research. They should be clear, however, that the lives of other people will often be affected by the validity of their judgments.

Suggested Citation

  • Iain Chalmers, 2003. "Trying to do more Good than Harm in Policy and Practice: The Role of Rigorous, Transparent, Up-to-Date Evaluations," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 22-40, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:589:y:2003:i:1:p:22-40
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716203254762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716203254762
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716203254762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Weisburd & Cynthia M. Lum & Anthony Petrosino, 2001. "Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 50-70, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joshua Newman & Emi Patmisari & Ida Widianingsih, 2022. "Policy analytical capacity and "Eastern" styles of policy analysis: evidence from West Java Province, Indonesia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 469-485, September.
    2. Lawrence W. Sherman, 2004. "Research and Policing: The Infrastructure and Political Economy of Federal Funding," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 593(1), pages 156-178, May.
    3. Lawrence W. Sherman & Heather Strang, 2004. "Experimental Ethnography: The Marriage of Qualitative and Quantitative Research," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 595(1), pages 204-222, September.
    4. Lawrence W. Sherman, 2003. "Experimental Evidence and Governmental Administration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 226-233, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David P. Farrington, 2003. "Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 49-68, May.
    2. Mark W. Lipsey, 2003. "Those Confounded Moderators in Meta-Analysis: Good, Bad, and Ugly," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 69-81, May.
    3. David Weisburd & Cynthia M. Lum & Sue-Ming Yang, 2003. "When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work†?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 31-48, May.
    4. Kevin Petersen & Robert C. Davis & David Weisburd & Bruce Taylor, 2022. "Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    5. Brandon C. Welsh & David P. Farrington, 2003. "Effects of Closed-Circuit Television on Crime," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 110-135, May.
    6. Dominic Pearson & David Torgerson & Cynthia McDougall & Roger Bowles, 2010. "Parable of Two Agencies, One of Which Randomizes," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 628(1), pages 11-29, March.
    7. Lawrence W. Sherman & Heather Strang, 2004. "Experimental Ethnography: The Marriage of Qualitative and Quantitative Research," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 595(1), pages 204-222, September.
    8. Friedrich Lösel & Andreas Beelmann, 2003. "Effects of Child Skills Training in Preventing Antisocial Behavior: A Systematic Review of Randomized Evaluations," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 587(1), pages 84-109, May.
    9. Kevin Petersen & David Weisburd & Sydney Fay & Elizabeth Eggins & Lorraine Mazerolle, 2023. "Police stops to reduce crime: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), March.
    10. Lawrence W. Sherman, 2003. "Experimental Evidence and Governmental Administration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 226-233, September.
    11. David Weisburd & John E. Eck, 2004. "What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 593(1), pages 42-65, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:589:y:2003:i:1:p:22-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.