IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v89y2024i4p735-760.html

Advancing Stratification Research by Measuring Non-declarative Cultural Capital: A National Population-Based Study Combining IAT and Survey Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jeroen van der Waal
  • Willem de Koster
  • Tim van Meurs
  • Kjell Noordzij
  • Joost Oude Groeniger
  • Julian Schaap

Abstract

Cultural capital is a central concept in stratification research. Crucial to the Bourdieusian habitus, upper strata familiarity with the dominant culture is assumed to be ingrained via socialization, allowing its members to smoothly navigate educational institutions and higher segments of the labor market. Although cultural capital is deemed partially implicit, such “non-declarative†or “embodied†cultural capital has largely escaped empirical scrutiny; arguments about its importance are typically post hoc interpretations of associations between measures of declarative cultural capital (survey items on elite cultural consumption) and variables of interest. To advance stratification research, we developed tools to empirically capture non-declarative cultural capital: Implicit Association Tests (IATs) measuring (1) positive association and (2) self-identification with elite culture, embedded in a survey fielded among a high-quality panel representative of the Dutch population ( n  = 2,436). We find our IATs validly measure non-declarative cultural capital. As expected, scores are only weakly coupled with declarative cultural capital, and associated with (parental) socioeconomic position. Using these IATs liberates non-declarative cultural capital from its deus ex machina status and answers the black-box critique of the Bourdieusian habitus as an explanation for socially stratified patterns across a range of fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeroen van der Waal & Willem de Koster & Tim van Meurs & Kjell Noordzij & Joost Oude Groeniger & Julian Schaap, 2024. "Advancing Stratification Research by Measuring Non-declarative Cultural Capital: A National Population-Based Study Combining IAT and Survey Data," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(4), pages 735-760, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:4:p:735-760
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224241261603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224241261603
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224241261603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michèle Lamont & Laura Adler & Bo Yun Park & Xin Xiang, 2017. "Bridging cultural sociology and cognitive psychology in three contemporary research programmes," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(12), pages 866-872, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mauricio Salgado & Alejandra Vásquez & Alejandra Yáñez, 2019. "Do Young People Adapt Their Prosocial Behaviour to That of Their Peers? An Experimental Exploration," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(3), pages 332-352, September.
    2. Bennouna, Cyril & Gillespie, Alli & Stark, Lindsay & Seff, Ilana, 2022. "Norms, Repertoires, & Intersections: Towards an integrated theory of culture for health research and practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Benjamin Ambuehl & Jennifer Inauen, 2022. "Contextualized Measurement Scale Adaptation: A 4-Step Tutorial for Health Psychology Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Paul B. Hutchings & Katie E. Sullivan, 2019. "Prejudice and the Brexit vote: a tangled web," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-5, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:4:p:735-760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.