IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljpg/v1i1p3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Litmus Test for Integrated Resource Management of Potable Water in Zimbabwe and South Africa: a Comp

Author

Listed:
  • Maxwell Musingafi
  • Johann Tempelhoff
  • Eric Nealer

Abstract

This study is a comparative analysis of one of the major pillars (stakeholder participation) of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM)induced public policies and services relating to potable water supply in selected cases in Zimbabwe and South Africa. The objectives of the study were to investigate the extent to which the stakeholder participation aspect of the IWRM paradigm has been implemented in each of four case study areas of Harare, Masvingo, Tshwane and Vhembe. Research methods involved both a theoretical review and an empirical study based on case studies, making use of comparative, qualitative, historical and exploratory approaches. The empirical research design was hybrid, although dominated by the descriptive survey approach. The study established that while the framework for a perfect stakeholder participation water management system exists in Zimbabwe and South Africa, the situation on the ground does not reflect this common belief. The study recommends an integrated systems approach to the management of potable water supply, full involvement of all stakeholders in the management process, intensive and extensive public campaigns, training, lobbying and advocacy. Among other recommendations are the due enforcement of water laws, venturing into entrepreneurial activities, interval reviews and check-ups, and walking the talk.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxwell Musingafi & Johann Tempelhoff & Eric Nealer, 2014. "Litmus Test for Integrated Resource Management of Potable Water in Zimbabwe and South Africa: a Comp," Journal of Public Policy & Governance, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 14-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:rss:jnljpg:v1i1p3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%203_1495825075.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rss:jnljpg:v1i1p3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danish Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.