Why Regulate Prices? Some Notes on the Price Cap Methods
We consider some recent criticisms of price cap methods of regulation, and suggest that many theoretical arguments, based on the so-called Bayesian approach, do not in fact point to practicable alternatives. We then investigate the use of simple and verifiable quantity regulatory methods, i.e. output floors. We find that they may lack of credibility. Moreover, in the prominent case of a multi-product regulated firm, they do not appear to improve the known desirable welfare properties of price caps. As a preliminary conclusion, we retain the opinion that price caps still stand as a sound regulatory method.
Volume (Year): 92 (2002)
Issue (Month): 2 (March-April)
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rpo:ripoec:v:92:y:2002:i:2:p:13-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabrina Marino)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.