IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v20y2025i4p20-35.html

Multi-Criteria Evaluation Of The Bicycle Pathways In Caraguatatuba, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Kozoroski A. A. TORRES

    (Federal Institute Science, Education and Technology of São Paulo, Caraguatatuba, SP, Brazil)

  • Vassiliki T. Galvão BOULOMYTIS

    (Federal Institute Science, Education and Technology of São Paulo, Caraguatatuba, SP, Brazil)

  • Claudia Durand ALVES

    (National Department of Transport Infrastructure, Brasilia, DF, Brazil)

  • Antonio Carlos ZUFFO

    (State University of Campinas, Campinas , SP, Brazil)

Abstract

Caraguatatuba, the most populous municipality on São Paulo’s northeastern coast, experiences high travel demand. Despite gaps in public transport coverage, the city’s flat topography encourages intensive bicycle use. This study evaluates the efficiency and technical limitations of Caraguatatuba’s cycling infrastructure by developing a quantifiable performance index. A survey with 70 users was conducted to determine the key criteria that affected their cycling experience. A cognitive mapping approach supported the criteria selection, later refined through expert consultation using the Delphi method. Criteria were weighted using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), and efficiency scores were assigned to 100-meter segments along major cycling routes using Geographic Information Systems (GIS).Results indicate that 47% of the network falls within a medium-efficiency range (index scores between 3.1 and 4.0). Higher-performing segments were primarily located along the seaside avenue, while lower scores were observed in southern areas with greater social vulnerability and less tourist activity. Deficiencies in maintenance and drainage were the most significant contributors to reduced infrastructure quality in these areas. The study offers a replicable framework for evaluating cycling infrastructure, which can assist urban managers in prioritizing investment and improvement strategies. It contributes to the broader goal of increasing cycling mode share and enhancing the overall efficiency and equity of urban transport systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Kozoroski A. A. TORRES & Vassiliki T. Galvão BOULOMYTIS & Claudia Durand ALVES & Antonio Carlos ZUFFO, 2025. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation Of The Bicycle Pathways In Caraguatatuba, Brazil," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(4), pages 20-35, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:20:y:2025:i:4:p:20-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/v20i4/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boulomytis, V.T.G. & Zuffo, A.C. & Imteaz, M.A., 2019. "Detection of flood influence criteria in ungauged basins on a combined Delphi-AHP approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chun-Chieh Tseng & Jun-Yi Zeng & Min-Liang Hsieh & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of Innovation Drivers of New and Old Kinetic Energy Conversion Using a Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Chinese Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Chen, Yinuo & Xie, Shuyi & Tian, Zhigang, 2022. "Risk assessment of buried gas pipelines based on improved cloud-variable weight theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Hassan Darabi & Hadis Kordani & Ardeshir JamshidAbadi, 2022. "Flood anticipation, reality, and uncertainty, the 2019 flood in Khuzestan, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(1), pages 365-381, August.
    4. Majumdar, Abhijit & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar & Agarwal, Aastha & Prajapat, Kanika, 2021. "A new case of rank reversal in analytic hierarchy process due to aggregation of cost and benefit criteria," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    5. Babak Zolghadr-Asli & Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Maedeh Enayati & Xuefeng Chu, 2021. "A review of 20-year applications of multi-attribute decision-making in environmental and water resources planning and management," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14379-14404, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:20:y:2025:i:4:p:20-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.