IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Women’s role in leading organizations

Listed author(s):
  • Alecxandrina DEACONU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Lavinia RASCÃ

    (The Institute for Business Administration in Bucharest, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    Good leadership became very important for employees’ engagement and productivity, while companies where women are promoted in leadership positions enjoy very good economic results. Starting from these facts, the authors focused their research on studying a triangle of concepts: leadership, gender, generation, aiming to understand which the characteristics of women leaders are, how they are different fromthose of men leaders, and how the role and importance of women leaders are perceived by different generations of employees. The authors, aiming to check the hypothesis that female leadership is valuable in modern organizations, reviewed the literature, were inspired by the ten descriptors presented by Kouzes and Posner (Checklist of Admired Leaders, 2002) as being the characteristics of successful leaders, and conducted a quantitative research. They developed a questionnaire and sent it out to employees of large companies in Romania. The data were processed with the SPSS program (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). The research results show differences in perceptions related to this topic between male and female respondents, between those holding different positions in the organizations, and between generations. Similarities and differences between women and men as leaders were also revealed. Starting from the findings of the research, the authors made some recommendation for improving leadership within organizations, pointing out the need of a balance between men and women at the top.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania in its journal REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT.

    Volume (Year): 16 (2015)
    Issue (Month): 4 (October)
    Pages: 439-450

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:16:y:2015:i:4:p:439-450
    Contact details of provider: Postal:

    Phone: 0040-01-2112650
    Fax: 0040-01-3129549
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:16:y:2015:i:4:p:439-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marian Nastase)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.