IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v3y2011i2p46-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing The Validity Of The Model For Improving The Public Policy Making Process In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela PACESILA

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Piata Romana, 6, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper presents a descriptive model on public policy cycle and the basic competencies in the modernized public policy making process. This model comprises o series of features, three coordinates (vision, effectiveness and continuous improvement), a total of nine core principles and definitions of the core principles. The paper focuses on the validity of proposed model for improving the public policy making process in Romania. A questionnaire survey was distributed to the specialists involved in the public policy process at central level in order to find out their opinion and reaction across the proposals.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela PACESILA, 2011. "Testing The Validity Of The Model For Improving The Public Policy Making Process In Romania," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(2), pages 46-73, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:46-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrp.ase.ro/no32/f5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public policy principles; the validity of the model for improving the public policy making process; analysis of variance (ANOVA); alternative hypothesis and null hypothesis; age and graduated specialization variance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:3:y:2011:i:2:p:46-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.