IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Experience of Infrastructure Projects Financing


  • Freidina, Irina A.

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)


The article examines practical experience of financing of infrastructure projects in the US, Australia, Chile, China, India and Kazakhstan. The author points out the specifics of the circulation of infrastructure bonds. Financing of infrastructure projects through bonds has both advantages and disadvantages. In the world practice, there are examples of successful application of the mechanism of issuing infrastructure bonds in order to finance real projects. In the US, infrastructure bonds are issued at the municipal level and are called special purpose bonds. In recent years, financing of infrastructure projects is actively developing in the world practice due to corporatization. In order to attract investments, infrastructure funds are being created in countries with developed economy that already account for 2% of the total investment funds. The world largest investor in the development of transport infrastructure is China which invests amounts equivalent to 8% of the national GDP in infrastructure projects. In the system of financing of the transport infrastructure facilities in India, the main focus is on private capital. The share of the state budget funds and government loans in the volume of the infrastructure investments is a little more than 35%. Today, imperfection of the legal mechanism obstructing an effective implementation of this type of financial instruments is a serious problem as regards the introduction of infrastructure bonds in Russia. The author brings forth recommendations for adoption of infrastructure bonds in the Russian financial market. The international experience of using bonds to finance the construction and modernization of transport infrastructure allows us to assert that this channel of attracting investments is the most promising for Russia.

Suggested Citation

  • Freidina, Irina A., 2017. "International Experience of Infrastructure Projects Financing," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 196-203, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1748

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Agency Problems and Residual Claims," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 327-349, June.
    2. Torsten Persson & Guido Tabellini, 2002. "Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262661314, January.
    3. Jean Tirole, 2006. "The Theory of Corporate Finance," Post-Print hal-00173191, HAL.
    4. Li Hao & Wing Suen, 2009. "Viewpoint: Decision-making in committees," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(2), pages 359-392, May.
    5. Jeffrey S. Rosenthal & Martin J. Osborne & Matthew A. Turner, 2000. "Meetings with Costly Participation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 927-943, September.
    6. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    7. Hongbin Cai, 2009. "Costly participation and heterogeneous preferences in informational committees," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(1), pages 173-189.
    8. K. Sonin & I. Khovanskaya., 2009. "A Political Economy Model of a Research University," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 7.
    9. Willam O. Brown, 1997. "University Governance and Academic Tenure: A Property Rights Explanation," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 153(3), pages 441-441, September.
    10. Gordon C. Winston, 1997. "Why Can't a College be More Like a Firm?," Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education DP-42, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    infrastructure bonds; public-private partnership; development institutions; transport infrastructure.;

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.