Author
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze how differentiation in the development of the ICT sector in terms of two kinds of indicators (for either “formative” or “characterizing” ICT) may affect a country’s or region’s economic output, a relationship which this study seeks to better understand. The research hypothesis is that the degree of impact on the economic indicators of a country’s development that is attributable to heterogeneity in the ICT sector, classified as either “formative” or “characterizing,” is not the same. To test this hypothesis, three types of models were constructed incorporating either general effects, fixed effects, or random effects. The impact on economic growth from control variables that are not directly related to the ICT sector was also tested. The results of the study indicate that the cumulative effect of a single unit increase in each of the components that make up the formative ICT factors (because of development in related components) is greater than the effect from a like increase in components that are among the characterizing ICT factors; and this different impact produces in a 7.96% increase in GRP per capita. The authors’ expectations about the positive effects of a number of factors pertaining to labor resources and capital on the value of GRP per capita were also confirmed. One advantage of the proposed theoretical approach is that it permits the range of explanatory variables to be expanded and the dependent variable to be replaced by one consistent with the goals under consideration and the corresponding tools.
Suggested Citation
Burdina, Lidia (Бурдина, Лидия) & Butorina, Oksana (Буторина, Оксана), 2024.
"The Effect of ICT Formation and Development on the Dynamics of Production Output [Влияние Процессов Формирования И Развития Икт На Динамику Объемов Производства],"
Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 19(1), pages 92-125.
Handle:
RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ec2404
DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2024-1-92-125
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ec2404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.