IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v6y2014i1p8-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of Priority Cause and Effect Chains on the Strategy Map of Goals Using AHP Multiple Criteria Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sanja Penić

Abstract

Today, when the labor market is extremely dynamic, and there is great competition, a certain level of knowledge is expected of every individual. This has influenced an increase in the number of higher education institutions, primarily in the private sector. To cope better with the growing global competition, the management of private higher education institutions is becoming increasingly aware of the needs to select the appropriate management methods. That would ensure the achievement of strategic goals and make a unique and clear methodology, easily applicable in today's turbulent environment. The paper proposes a unique management methodology which would represent a strategic management framework applicable to most private higher education institutions. The creation of a strategy map of goals by linking SWOT and BSC methods with multiple criteria decision method is described. An emphasis is placed on the application of the multiple criteria decision-making method in the objective selection of priority cause and effect chains in the BSC strategy map. The result of the application of the proposed methodological framework targets the priority cause and effect chains, i.e. strategies which would enable the achievement of vision and mission.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanja Penić, 2014. "Selection of Priority Cause and Effect Chains on the Strategy Map of Goals Using AHP Multiple Criteria Analysis," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(1), pages 8-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:8-16
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v6i1.1096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/1096/1096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/1096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v6i1.1096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L.C. Koo & Hannah Koo, 2007. "Holistic approach for diagnosing, prioritising, implementing and monitoring effective strategies through synergetic fusion of SWOT, Balanced Scorecard and QFD," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 62-78.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Collins Okello & Stefania Pindozzi & Salvatore Faugno & Lorenzo Boccia, 2014. "Appraising Bioenergy Alternatives in Uganda Using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a Desirability Functions Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Ratapol Wudhikarn & Danaitun Pongpatcharatorntep, 2022. "An Improved Intellectual Capital Management Method for Selecting and Prioritizing Intangible-Related Aspects: A Case Study of Small Enterprise in Thailand," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Stefano Bruzzese & Simone Blanc & Silvia Novelli & Filippo Brun, 2023. "A Multicriteria Analysis to Support Natural Resource Governance: The Case of Chestnut Forests," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:8-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.